I've done CCW with a snub-nose 9mm using star clips. Similar reload situation, but it didn't have near the same business-end visual effect.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0E6d8K18KzY
This is a move in Congress today to eliminate "Qualified Immunity" for law enforcement. Qualified Immunity is the legal concept that police are generally exempt from laws while enforcing the law. While "Back the Blue" is generally good, there is a side to this matter that the pro-LE side needs to consider: Police can be assholes. The problem involves things like a police officer shooting your dog because he THINKS the dog MIGHT end up threatening him SOMEHOW. Because "the right to keep and handle dogs" is not clearly established in constitutional jurisprudence, the best the dog owner can do is maybe collect financial recompense from the department. The trigger-happy bum with a badge MIGHT get SOME sort of reprimand about SOMETHING. But no charges will ever be filed. (As I told a police officer friend recently: "This is why even White people hate police.")
"RULE OF THREE": In a comparison of group results in a quantified test, the White aggregate will fall between the Asian (Yellow) and Black aggregates, usually much closer to the Asian result.
New Member of "The Squad" Says the SAT and Standardized Tests are a "Pillar Of Systemic Racism" | Dan Bongino
Instead of declaring that standardized tests are bad if black Americans don’t test as well, maybe we should be asking why that is and trying to address the problem so those kids will benefit. For example, maybe we should be asking why Asian Americans are outscoring everyone else on the SAT, including white Americans. Does anyone think it’s because the test is biased in their favor?
ANSWERED! If one can reject their White Guilt long enough to accept it.
And here's a snippit from the Fox News article linked to the article:
In 2017, the New York state Board of Regents voted to drop a literacy test for prospective teachers, pointing to the large percentage of Black and Hispanic candidates who were failing the test.
Rule of Three is true. BUT, it should be noted in the interest of not promoting "White Supremacy" that the mainstream of racial comparative thought is refining it down to a two-sided "Light" versus "Dark" contrast. Asians are losing their "People of Color" status and being lopped in Whites due to the increasingly obvious fact that Western culture and civilization is NOT biased expressly pro-White, but rather by being objective is showing the reality of racial demographic traits. While the lopping together is reasonable, it is actually being done to obscure this racial reality and the reality of Western society.
Here on CGNS I reported a recent example in a school district in Washington state doing this: H/t: https://twitter.com/StevenWelliever/status/1328075308218470400
ARCHIVED COPY: MonitoringStudentGrowth.pdf (archive.org) https://web.archive.org/web/20201116053140if_/https://www.nthurston.k12.wa.us//cms/lib/WA01001371/Centricity/Domain/2664/MonitoringStudentGrowth.pdf
RELATED LINKS:
- New PC ID: Asians (Yellows) aren't "People of Color" now -- Now they can be "racist," too! - https://catsgunsandnationalsecurity.blogspot.com/2020/11/new-pc-id-asians-yellows-arent-people.html
- Russert's "Rule of Three": Asiatics get the White treatment, and essentially for same reason -- Lesson for "White nationalists." - https://catsgunsandnationalsecurity.blogspot.com/2020/11/new-pc-id-asians-yellows-arent-people.html
I like my interpretation better.
Luke Combs – Forever After All Lyrics | Genius Lyrics https://genius.com/21248906
Please pardon the formatting issues. Since I'm just a regular guy more focused on ideas than form, I do my best, but this platform gives fits.
CAUTIONARY NOTE TO COMMON GUNNERS:
Please, folks, be sophisticated in your reading of material like this. As we recently saw in the lead-up to the consummation of the 2020 Election Steal, and as noted by such great minds as Victor Davis Hanson, it can be difficult to discuss worst-case scenarios and responses to them without sounding as though one is resigned to them or even supportive of them. Sometimes it's necessary to take things arguendo just to discuss the whole matter. So when reading this or other things in TDF and elsewhere on maintaining baseline RKBA, keep in mind that often this is not an endorsement of a position, but rather a practical tool. There are cases where I am very literally definitive in my analyses--e.g., on full-auto or the distinction in Anglo-American Common Law and jurisprudence between "Blackstone" and "Militia" above and elsewhere--but often it's a working up of arguments (read, "BS") for the politics and jurisprudence of it all. And sometimes, it can simply a realistic recognition of where we are headed. I may not like some of the readings of law, the Constitution, or history I have discussed over the years, but I have put them out there both to stir discussion and to maintain the crucial core of what I personally consider the second most important "right" of a person--right after private personal worship--that baseline Right to personal Arms. Libertarianism is not my drive--function is.
Maintaining defensive capability and American/Western heritage, plus aspiring toward Militia efficacy--frankly in that order, given the current setting--must be the aim.
