PERSONAL: My--that is, OUR--life

ETERNAL

(When the time comes that I can't care for a cat and bear arms, there is no life left.)

CURRENT ACTIVIST FOCUS

==========================================================

("My Kitty, My Carry Piece, and Me")

----------------------------------------------------------------------

(BONUS 😁:)

In Memory of Roy Clark

Objective reality shows one thing--PC ID Politics can't handle it

Donald Trump Jr. tweeted about the article below: "Now winning is sexist. When will the bs end?" -- https://twitter.com/DonaldJTrump…/status/1052014305481089024

MY BRILLIANT COMMENTARY: What she's saying falls in on the "meritocracy is racist" concept. When an objective and legitimate measure yields results that uphold traditional White/Western structure, they are "racist" or "sexist" or whatever. Not that the measure is twisted, but that the approach yields results that oppose their agenda.

PC makes it hard to say it, but the truth is that meritocracy--a system where advancement is based on how OBJECTIVELY good one is--bears out that races are different and sexes are different. That, of course, implies aggregate qualitative differences between demographics, and that's "[INSERT CATEGORY HERE]-ist"--at least when noted by someone on the conservative/Right. Yet the facts are the facts--even if they are "hate facts."

https://t.co/bvUO6A0JTW

— Breitbart News (@BreitbartNews) October 16, 2018

ROY CLARK, YESTERDAY, WHEN I WAS YOUNG

(MUSIC VIDEO) Mark Steyn: She Only Talks That Way To The Cat

Trump Derangement Syndrome in Desperate Delusions mode

This is literally all that "Trump-Russia" nuts have: Because it's a clever story, it should be investigated.

That would describe most UFO/alien stories, except that most of them have more actual evidence.

From "A Second Look at the Steele Dossier": https://www.justsecurity.org/44697/steele-dossier-knowing/

How the Left uses the term, "racism"

Regarding 17 JUL 2016 Trump-Putin press conference

TRUMP'S CLARIFICATION AND CORRECTION:

President Trump: “I don’t see any reason why it wouldn’t be Russia… We are doing everything in our power to prevent Russian interference in 2018.” pic.twitter.com/ddJcGiJoGI

— The White House (@WhiteHouse) July 17, 2018

WATCH VIDEO!

Mark Levin Sounds Off on 'Psychopaths' in The Media: 'They've Had More Positions on Russia Than Stormy Daniels' https://t.co/lgei1B8CHk via @mediaite

— Lee Walker (@TgGRA) July 19, 2018

"At that moment in Helsinki, for Mr. Trump, the question of choosing between Vladimir Putin (ex-KGB despot) and Mr. Trump’s own experience of being set up, framed and relentlessly persecuted by the American “intelligence community” to this day, must have felt like the choice between Scylla and Charybdis. Either would destroy him, and no matter what he said, the Left would shriek the sky is falling yet again."

Trump Has Been Set Up, Framed And Relentlessly Persecuted By The American Intelligence Community https://t.co/Svr45TJv8T via @dailycaller

— Lee Walker (@TgGRA) July 20, 2018

.@newtgingrich: "By any standard, Trump is tougher on Russia than Obama ever dreamed of. He has expelled 60 Russian agents from the country. He has closed 4 Russian offices. He has imposed sanctions on over 100 Russian individuals and companies." https://t.co/SX4jjHCQB4 pic.twitter.com/diUDHzDmaE

— Fox News (@FoxNews) July 19, 2018

Trump Stood Up to Putin, Obama Appeased Him https://t.co/bVEqiOUwyz

— Lee Walker (@TgGRA) July 19, 2018

Just Like Obama, Trump’s Russia Policy Speaks Louder Than His Words https://t.co/x6vYkolWk3

— Lee Walker (@TgGRA) July 19, 2018

The Trump/Putin Summit Is the Worst Thing Ever...Until the Next Worst Thing Ever https://t.co/8JPbkppQCX

— Lee Walker (@TgGRA) July 19, 2018

Everyone Is Smart Except Trump https://t.co/jwGB5Wjx9o

— Lee Walker (@TgGRA) July 19, 2018

“Trump recognized Russian Meddling MANY TIMES” pic.twitter.com/T8MERS93wI

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 19, 2018

MY TAKE (AT LEAST SOME OF IT):

Trump sees common ground with Russia/Putin. Both men are leaders in an anti-globalist movement worldwide.  Our respective countries are "competitors"--the term used in intl civil peacekeeping for the different parties--but there is common ground.  https://t.co/NIBnrSrR7f

— Lee Walker (@TgGRA) July 19, 2018

We stand or fall together

Heller Day plus ten years

In honor of the tenth anniversary of the Heller 2A SCOTUS decision.

Let us be mindful of the situation the Right to Arms faces--and the special function it serves in our time.

https://twitter.com/TgGRA/status/1011642193969405952

"LAST-DITCH 2A" (combined panel)

"Last-Ditch 2A"

"The Twin Pillars of America's Future: Threatened"

Just one of many like this I've done.

MORE 2A analysis panel improvements!

"Genius is a journey as much as a state of intellectual standing."
-- Me

3-PANEL PRESENTATION:

  ====================================================================
"LEAN AND TRIM" SINGLE PANEL:

  ====================================================================
PLUSSED UP "LEAN AND TRIM" SINGLE PANEL:

  ====================================================================
APPENDICES (supporting information not formatted):

Plussed-up version of the single-panel 2A analysis

. Adds the tactical assessment behind the three recommendations for goals.

(F)p2TP summary supericon

EDITED: REVISED (slightly): Okay, okay, here it is: My "third way" 2A advocacy plan now lean and trim on a SINGLE PANEL!

Click on and save to computer to open and enlarge for easier reading.

My "third way" approach to Second Amendment advocacy (down to 3 panels and 2 appendices)

My "third way" Second Amendment advocacy approach, which considers the issue from the proper perspective--not "rights" (pro-gun) or "disarmament" (anti-gun), but rather from the amendment's own stated function of Militia efficacy--is down to three main panels and two appendices! (Might add an icon or two later.)

APPENDICES

"It's time for us to protect the crown."

More about (F)p2TP

Birth of a Movement--"(Fire)Power to the People"--(F)P2TP

The answer to the anti-gunners' question that libertarians have trouble giving

"Rights don't depend on 'need'" doesn't quite work. So here's the answer.

More Second Amendment storyboards

These approach the matter from different angles. Thus, sometimes the language or sense won't be a hundred percent in sync. None of these has ever been intended to be the answer to everything, but merely a resolution to a key point of contention. 

Another Second Amendment solution storyboard

Click to enlarge. Save to computer to enlarge for easier reading. 

"For The Common Use": My crazy idea for resolving the 'assault weapon' debate

Previous version here: http://catsgunsandnationalsecurity.blogspot.com/2018/03/further-expanded-my-crazy-idea-for.html

Being functionally focused when it comes to our rights, I take theologian Peter Marshall's approach of seeing freedom as the ability to do what is right, not entitlement to do simply what we want. Thus, here's my suggestion for resolving the whole "assault weapon" debate.  It's not ideal, but politics are always iffy, and it's better than a catastrophic loss of the Second Amendment. 

Click to enlarge or save to computer.

FURTHER EXPANDED "My crazy idea for resolving the 'assault weapon' debate"

Previous version here: http://catsgunsandnationalsecurity.blogspot.com/2018/03/expanded-my-crazy-idea-for-resolving.html

Being functionally focused when it comes to our rights, I take theologian Peter Marshall's approach of seeing freedom as the ability to do what is right, not entitlement to do simply what we want. Thus, here's my suggestion for resolving the whole "assault weapon" debate.  It's not ideal, but politics are always iffy, and it's better than a catastrophic loss of the Second Amendment. 

Quick critique for BOTH SIDES of the gun debate

Save to computer and enlarge for easier reading.

Response to one of the gun control kid's Twitter threads

Without my usual vitriole.

Save to computer, then open and enlarge for easier reading.

EXPANDED "My crazy idea for resolving the 'assault weapon' debate"

Being functionally focused when it comes to our rights, I take theologian Peter Marshall's approach of seeing freedom as the ability to do what is right, not entitlement to do simply what we want. Thus, here's my suggestion for resolving the whole "assault weapon" debate.  It's not ideal, but politics are always iffy, and it's better than a catastrophic loss of the Second Amendment. 

See also: https://catsgunsandnationalsecurity.blogspot.com/2018/03/slightly-modified-my-crazy-idea-for.html

Save to computer, then open and enlarge for easier reading. 

My response to one of the gun control kiddies

Save to computer, then open and enlarge for easier reading.

Slightly modified "My crazy idea for resolving the 'assault weapon' debate"

EXPANDED VERSION HERE: http://catsgunsandnationalsecurity.blogspot.com/2018/03/expanded-my-crazy-idea-for-resolving.html

Being functionally focused when it comes to our rights, I take theologian Peter Marshall's approach of seeing freedom as the ability to do what is right, not entitlement to do simply what we want. Thus, here's my suggestion for resolving the whole "assault weapon" debate.  It's not ideal, but politics are always iffy, and it's better than a catastrophic loss of the Second Amendment.  (Original here: http://catsgunsandnationalsecurity.blogspot.com/2018/02/my-crazy-idea-for-resolving-assault.html )

BASIS: From "7 Terrible Liberal Gun Control Arguments ... And How To Beat Them," by Kurt Schlichter -- https://t.co/ezzv0uHNAG