Cats, Guns, and National Security

The 2008 Heller vs DC case established explicitly in American jurisprudence that the Second Amendment dealt with and protected a PRIVATE right to arms by PRIVATE citizens in their PRIVATE capacity. Without this decision, nothing in the private arms realm would be constitutionally secure. The case was won by taking a moderate approach. The DC gun ban of the time worked by requiring handguns be registered, but forbidding any more to be registered after 1977-78. The approach taken was not to challenge the registration requirement, but simply to require DC to permit new registrations. It worked. But this is fundamentally contrary to the "principle" people who insist on a purist/libertarian interpretation of 2A and that every effort in that regard have no qualifications. The theoretical effort I suggest regarding pistol magazines in the face of magazine limitations ( TDF 90 ) is anathema to them. No partial measures to promote RKBA, and no conciliatory gestures, even to maintain f...

The most disillusioning thing about all of this is that no matter how promising some of these moderate bills may seem, if the side of Patriots ever gets power again, they will work to simply reset the situation to a place where the other side can gain power again. The side of Globalists, on the other hand, will always do the exact opposite--that is, they will work to prevent their opposite numbers from ever regaining power, or even operating as opposition. As federal voting legislation falters, state Republicans push to exert new powers over elections - CNNPolitics

Conservative talkers like these people failed to stop the Election Steal by calling for Federalist 46 action by the States. Federalist 46 State action is how we push back. Loesch raises "real consequences," then can only talk about money. This is why conservatives fail. They are faced with utter persecution, violence, and the loss of our country and heritage, but all they can think about it money and career. Selfishness will kill our people. As for D'Souza, he's a patriotic conservative immigrant of color who uses the Teabrainer definition of Right and Left, and tries to erase our racial background from our heritage.

On 23 June 2021, illegitimate President Joe Biden made statements about gun control that included an assertion that cannon could not be acquired at the time of the Second Amendment's passage. TDF readers know that artillery--call them "cannon" (Biden), "field pieces" (the Articles of Confederation), or whatever--factor into my Originalist work on the relationship between machine guns (full-auto) and 2A: TDF 10.   As stated there, there was no legislation, at least at the federal level, barring the acquisition of artillery. The only senses in which the insurrectionist Oval Office occupant's statement fits the facts are that localities might have acted to restrict such things, and quite frankly that only communities and the richie-rich were likely to ever have the means to acquire them. From TDF 10: But cannon remained the province of government and the leading aristocracy--big land owners, ship owners, small communities fighting off the aforementioned French ...

Was Hitler a "Critical Race Theorist"? Not really. "Critical Race Theory" is decidedly anti-White/Western and called "critical" by use of the Leftist "Critical Theory" method of propagation--constant, unrelenting, and often absurd criticism of the target. Without getting into political-science semantics (though I'm willing), Nazism was exactly the opposite. CHALLENGER'S QUESTION: "At the point of the spear, how does it differ from Hitler and the Jews?" The most pointed answer to your question is that CRT would--and I hate to say it like this in that context--have it the other way around. The supposedly "oppressed" group would be pushing agains t the supposed "oppressors." Critical Theory has built into it its beneficiaries being oppressed by its targets. Nazi efforts to portray Aryan peoples as oppressed by that group (the Jews) failed even then. The Germans were arguably "oppressed" by Versailles,...

Apologies for recent gap in publications. Personal matters connected to the greater mission of the blog had to take precedence. Plus, after the American people's failure in the Election Steal, I answer to no one.  Upcoming editions: 1. "How Heller would have been lost if 'principles' ruled pro-gunners." 2. "TRIPLE TITLE: 'Popular elections are the weak institutional link in American/Western civilization,' or 'Yes, Virginia, your man Washington should have been king,' or 'King Donald I, for he is the best available.'" 3. "Final word on heritage and arms: All that ultimately matters." TDF INDEX:  Cats, Guns, and National Security: THE DAILY FUDD index.    https://catsgunsandnationalsecurity.blogspot.com/2021/03/the-daily-fudd-index.html