Cats, Guns, and National Security

Next tool in the War on Whites and Western heritage. It literally ranks people by PC categories. And big surprise, White heterosexuals are lowest on the totem pole. The presenter does some good anti-Woke work, though he does exhibit a degree of White Guilt by not talking about Blacks here. I'm not sure how serious his N-a-z-i comparison and very general use of "eugenics" is. Nonetheless, the tool discussed is one that will be used in the ultimate subjugation of the White race and destruction of our Western heritage. White people supporting such things are traitors.

If I had the means of establishing a serious YouTube channel--and chose to stay on that platform--I would probably do something similar to this guy's operation--only with more cats. I'm so far Right that everyone seems to the Left, so I can't blanketly endorse this guy. But he does seem to go anti-PC/Globalist on a lot.

MY COMMENT : "Thank you for this sop to us un-Woke." This outfit of course carries common liberal leanings, but not as severely as some. This video is obviously to some degree or another an act, as the liberal PC stuff is quite apparent. But I don't care how little or how much it captures the presenter and the writing staff. ANOTHER, MORE SERIOUS COMMENT :  "'Even the poor people are fat.' "We really have eliminated true poverty in the Western world--and much of the rest."

H/t: Clare Lopez , one of my fave national security pundits. We don't always agree, but there is definite respect. The article takes an effort-based approach to the issue of mass/school shootings. Obviously, then, libertarian-types and Second Amendment purists won't be totally pleased with it. It even hits a sacred cow or two by rolling anti-gun talking points over, which would cause many Teabrainers to stop reading (presuming they can read). The biggest takeaway for people should be stated need to control crazy people. There are so many reasons for removing nutcases from society, and libertarian-minded people need to have this understanding imposed upon them. My post a few days ago:  Cats, Guns, and National Security: THE DAILY FUDD: E212: "Reality, but also unintended exposure of mental health inconsistency -- VIDEO: 'The gun genie’s out of the bottle: Former FBI deputy assistant director.'" (catsgunsandnationalsecurity.blogspot.com)  addresses much of what ...

 https://www.facebook.com/Godsgifts2us/posts/7825461827471703 Cats Can Be Veterans, Too: The Felines Who Lent a Helping Hand in WWI and WWII

MY COMMENT : (VIDEO WAS SPONSORED BY A COMPANY SELLING SUCH GEAR.) Non-vet civilians will never (legitimately) be running fire-and-maneuver calling for all that gear. In a real and legitimate Militia situation they will be fire support, set-position defense, and logistics. A simple mag pack is quite sufficient. Beyond that, anything much more than a pack or such for evacuating in a disaster is a hobby at best and a delusion at worst. I'm a vet. I served in a combat zone. I have a vest, CamelBak, and pack which I acquired during my service, and keep solely to be able to quickly bug out of town in a disaster, be it on foot or in an official evac vehicle with limited space. To non-vet LARPers: Buy what you want. Support this guy's sponsor. But keep in mind you are NOT the same as veterans. You lack the training and DISCIPLINE that veterans had drilled into them. If/when SHTF, you can serve a purpose, but you aren't the same. From TDF 172 : TDF INDEX:  Cats, Guns, and Nat...

The headline is correct: For non-NFA items, at least (and probably a few of them), there is too late in the USA to get rid of guns. Had gun control regimens been implemented from the beginning ( or even 1880 ), things might be different. But now, all that can be accomplished is disarming the good people in the face of threats from the bad people--which, of course, is the deep agenda behind the gun control push. However, the fellow discusses the mental health side of things. The problem is that too many on the pro-gun side will say that the crazy people are the problem--implying the answer is to control those people. On the other hand, they oppose any "Red Flag" laws, period, as a matter of course--implying control over those people is wrong.  In typical Teabrainer fashion, they suffer a cognitive dissonance in their rhetoric, squared only their libertarian foolishness  in supporting a politically self-defeating and politically and socially irresponsible vision ( TDF 41 ,...

MY COMMENT :  7.62mm NATO makes more sense than .223/5.56mm for civilian 2A Militia. Non-vets don't have the training or discipline to take battlefield advantage of the "assault rifle" characteristics. In a deep Militia situation, they will be doing fire-support, set-position defense, and logistics--NOT fire-and-maneuver assaults. Add in the political factor: .308 is less conducive to "assault"-type situations. A featureless rifle in .308 has far reduced "assaultive" characteristics (.223/5.56 has become innately associated with mass shootings), as well as higher "sporting" use (as cover). All this can help protect such a weapon from AW-type bans if played right. 2A is not about hobbies or preferences. It's about preserving firepower. And should mag limits be implemented, ten rounds of 7.62 beats ten rounds of 5.56. Personal battle rifle picks: A NY-compliant M14 due to familiarity of many, or a .308 AK pattern due to maintenance issues...