From the Declaration of Independence. Note that Chinese, Swazi, and Turkish backgrounds are not mentioned. And even other European backgrounds--like German--are omitted.
And that is why other demographics will always feel a certain apprehension here. Between jealousy at what our White/Western peoples have accomplished north of the Rio Grande (and south, for that matter), the quite natural fact that our society and culture are European-based (every demographic founding a country sets its culture and society accordingly--unless it starts out with a White Guilt-type pathology), or the Rule of Three (now turning into a Light vs Dark contrast), minority or non-dominant peoples in a setting--and that almost always means the darker-skinned peoples--will almost always go liberal/Left politically. Whether it be a resistance to "colonial domination" (Africa and Southeast Asia), an effort to head off the perceived threat from nationalist movements by the dominant light-skinned demographic (Jews, frankly; also other non-Nordic/Aryan Whites), or resentment over perceived wrongs from centuries before (American Blacks; ethnic Koreans in Japan), even if their culture itself is rather conservative, they will vote Left to keep down their host country and its pride.
They may ascribe it to actual problems in the past. But regardless, their actions are in the present.
The failure of the American people to stay the MAGA course and instead to permit the 2020 Election Steal can be ascribed heavily to a White/Western Guilt pathology. There are other factors--fear, laziness, materialistic and ideological selfishness, libertarianism, and the business self-interest of leading voices on "our side"--but ultimately we have lost the natural drive to stand for our demographic. I would work to challenge this pathology with the graphic below:
But few would spread it, and I would take shots that it was "making things worse." Those shots came in some cases from minorities--which makes them meaningless, as they were benefitting from the situation--but some came from fellow Whites on the conservative/Right. Those people were reacting out of the same factors that blocked resisting the Election Steal. They wouldn't stand for their own people.
Prior to that failure, I had anticipated a grand civil war with a partial racial component. That anticipation did not happen, but my discussion of it merits referencing:
It is not too late.
In the TDF series, I have pointed to handguns as a priority over long guns. The reason is that unless a shift in this pathology and priority among my people turns, and turns soon, the heavier firepower will become useless--as if it would even still be legal. Long guns are most advisable in set facility defense, as kinetic action with a full-power rifle apart from that can be harder to defend in court as "legitimate self-defense." And in those settings, there are less-likely-to-be-banned (outright) options that can serve the purpose. Thus, CCW in public and "modern blunderbusses" in the home (and travel, perhaps) take on a higher importance. As preserving our heritage becomes more of a subculture, making our kinetic defense more subdued can make it more survivable. That is, while ARs are great for defending the home...
...their legal future is one of condemnation. They WILL be banned. (And because people didn't listen to me about Federalist 46, there isn't a damn thing they can do about it.)
The only alternative is an enclave system whereby Whites and a few others live in offset, delineated areas, and where community defense without regard to AW bans and such is feasible. But Idaho and other such areas simply cannot support all of us. In any case, it would require some sort of change of character. Libertarianism and individualism would have to stop. This might come by sincere repentance or by the crushing of individual pride and maybe spirit, but it would have to come.
Thus, it appears we face a fate similar to our brethren in Rhodesia and South Africa, with us living in mainstream society, but under the domination of, frankly, others. In that situation, a subdued but effective defense structure to keep our heritage alive until "the time" comes seems the only choice. (A future article will correlate and condense that matter.)
Our people have made their bed. Unless the wake up, they--we--will have to lie in it.
Prior to that failure, I had anticipated a grand civil war with a partial racial component. That anticipation did not happen, but my discussion of it merits referencing:
It is not too late.
In the TDF series, I have pointed to handguns as a priority over long guns. The reason is that unless a shift in this pathology and priority among my people turns, and turns soon, the heavier firepower will become useless--as if it would even still be legal. Long guns are most advisable in set facility defense, as kinetic action with a full-power rifle apart from that can be harder to defend in court as "legitimate self-defense." And in those settings, there are less-likely-to-be-banned (outright) options that can serve the purpose. Thus, CCW in public and "modern blunderbusses" in the home (and travel, perhaps) take on a higher importance. As preserving our heritage becomes more of a subculture, making our kinetic defense more subdued can make it more survivable. That is, while ARs are great for defending the home...
The only alternative is an enclave system whereby Whites and a few others live in offset, delineated areas, and where community defense without regard to AW bans and such is feasible. But Idaho and other such areas simply cannot support all of us. In any case, it would require some sort of change of character. Libertarianism and individualism would have to stop. This might come by sincere repentance or by the crushing of individual pride and maybe spirit, but it would have to come.
Thus, it appears we face a fate similar to our brethren in Rhodesia and South Africa, with us living in mainstream society, but under the domination of, frankly, others. In that situation, a subdued but effective defense structure to keep our heritage alive until "the time" comes seems the only choice. (A future article will correlate and condense that matter.)
Our people have made their bed. Unless the wake up, they--we--will have to lie in it.
