MY COMMENT: "If the Californians spent less time in the hobby of trying to find technicalities in their State's laws, and more time just acquiring and practicing with a decent CA-legal fighting rifle, they'd be in much better shape to work for restoration of Patriots to power in DC, and then beg for intervention by federal and other-State forces to liberate them. They'd just have to rest under military occupation for a couple of generations at their expense."
The effort here is to take part of the current law to override the general definition of "pistol grip." (I discuss that particular "evil feature" in TDF 54.) One line that confuses me is that the YouTuber claims "federal law" states that a certain aspect of what California law would require in handling a weapon is "unsafe." I have asked about it: MY COMMENT: "One question: Where does federal law discuss what is "unsafe" in this regard? The Consumer Product Safety Commission is explicitly barred by Congress from issuing safety regs for firearms due to an attempt in the 1970s to do a backdoor handgun ammo ban."
TDF INDEX: Cats, Guns, and National Security: THE DAILY FUDD index. https://catsgunsandnationalsecurity.blogspot.com/2021/03/the-daily-fudd-index.html
