MY COMMENT: "Presenter here debunks his own point by calling for people not to express certain viewpoints. He creates a straw man argument by saying YT deletes based simply on word usage. In truth, certain words trigger greater scrutiny, and certain combinations of words can trigger automatic deletions. Hence the encryption of some terms does make sense. For instance, i discovered on one channel that my use of the term "W-H-I-T-E G-U-I-L-T" not encrypted like that would not be publicly visible (whether it was the channel or YT doing it, I do not know), and so I had to encrypt it with dashes to get my comment to stand.
"He is correct that the heritage of YT's CEO or other officers is not at issue. Those thinking this are being shallow in their analysis and forgetting the guiding principle of Leftwing activism: "The issue is never the issue. The issue is the Revolution." It's not specifically about alleged J-e-w-i-s-h conspiracies. It's about how ideas fall on the political spectrum--Left or Globalist versus Right or Patriot--and promoting one end of that spectrum. (Please note that even the good guys' side can have bad guys on the same end of the spectrum.) "He submits to the agenda his channel seems to be aimed at combatting. Based on viewing, my own assessment would be that he thinks he's being simply pragmatic, but does suffer a bit of the PC White Guilt, which is even more established in the UK than it is in the U.S. He genuinely tries, and he certainly does some good work. What he says here at the end is not wrong, but an acknowledgement of the viewpoint censorship would help his credibility."The things that matter in life.
The things that matter in life.
