I'll keep it simple:
-
There is no question Obama is better than Ron Paul on national security and the Global War on Terrorism [aka, "... Towelheads"] (GWOT). On our Right to Keep and Bear Arms (RKBA), Ron Paul is politically pro-Second Amendment, while Obama is anti-Second Amendment. However, Ron Paul's foreign policy would open America up to foreign domination, be it other state actors and UN-type organization which oppose private arms, or Jihadists whose Shariah law forbids dhimmi infidels from doing so.
-
So on two of the three important issues--national security and guns--Obama is actually comes out with a net lead over Paul.
-
As for the third and final important issue--namely, CATS--it is known that Muslims like cats, whereas Paul as a libertarian is inclined to oppose animal cruelty laws, even voting against outlawing the interstate shipment of "crush" videos, where kittens are crushed to death for entertainment.
-
So we see that on the three important issues facing our society--GWOT, RKBA, and CATS--Obama beats Ron Paul.
-
...
-
You're welcome.
