Cats, Guns, and National Security

A little over an hour, but worth it. Runs directly counter to the “blackpilling” gaining traction on the Right. It’s a rejection of purism. I write about this many times in my Daily Fudd series. A few notable points: - Circa 47:00 — Recognizes coming civil war will be state based . - Circa 48:00 — Recognizes purism as “virtue signaling.” - Circa 48:40 — Actually uses the term “Rhodesia.“😀 - Circa 50:00 — Excellent perspective on the “War on Drugs.” I acknowledge it may be a bit too conciliatory toward the potheads and libertarians – but I repeat myself. - Circa 59:00 — Problem with his “save the country in one generation” idea is that sins and problems linger through generations.  - Circa 1:04:40 — Guest argues against “accelerationism” — the idea of letting or making things get bad faster, and hopefully cause a reaction — citing Rhodesia as a case study of what happens. - 1:05:14 — Takes on an ultimate self-focused, shortsighted Teabrainer , Though I suspect it may have been a m...

Prediction first: I remain convinced that the coming civil war in America will be more geographical than some supposed thinkers think. Three levels: Red state vs Blue state with a number of Red states initially attempting to stay neutral. Split states — those which go one way nationally, but oddly have the other side governing at state level — will probably go the way of the state government. Red states will have Blue pockets, mostly urban, which will be isolated. Key locations, such as memorials and industrial facilities, will be seized by the state. Blue states will struggle with Red rural areas – upstate New York and downstate Illinois being prime examples — leading to county successions some degree and formality or another to bordering Red states. This will greatly redraw the map of the war. Small enclaves opposed to the side dominating their area. More than citadels or Mount Carmels, but often less than counties. Yet with a certain geographical definition.  Private vigilante a...