Cats, Guns, and National Security

Yes. Require people to "identify" according to their chromosomes, with that less than one percent with truly screwed-up chromosomes and completely indeterminant features making a choice and sticking with it. And if that latter group is misgendered, require them to put up with it. Included in this would be regulating use of hormones and other chemical or surgical aspects of trans practice--even for those cases already in progress--banning counseling in favor of transition, and sanctions against public presentation of oneself in contradiction of their genetic sex. (This latter point is somewhat subjective and of course subject to context--undercover detectives and actual costume parties not affected--and so would be used only in egregious cases.) 

Libertarians reject the fact that laws exist. Purists refuse to accept that reality doesn't go like that, and/or act accordingly. And both use their "principles" to refuse to engage in gritty bargaining and negotiations to save some or even most of the current level of RKBA. It's all or nothing to them--and nothing is closer to what they're likely to get for all of us. The answer is simple: FUCK THEIR PRINCIPLES. (Actually, it's to fuck THEM, but they can be useful.) Firepower is more important than principle, because firepower stops BLM thugs from raping our White daughters , while principle and five bucks might get you a coffee at Starbucks . BLM thugs don't freeze in position when your ten-round magazine runs dry and you yell, "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!" while loading another ten-rounder (see TDF 90 ). "But I shouldn't have to reload that soon! So the rules should be that they freeze while I do!" There ain't no rules in real li...

It's due to her handling of the Greitens case. But whatever the reason, the bitch needs taking down. St. Louis Prosecutor Who Charged McCloskeys on the Verge of Losing Her Law License | Dan Bongino https://bongino.com/st-louis-prosecutor-who-charged-mccloskeys-on-the-verge-of-losing-her-law-license S oros backed St. Louis prosecutor Kim Gardner, who chose to charge the McCloskey’s for defending their property from threatening, trespassing members of Black Lives Matter, could lose her law license over misconduct in the case of former Missouri Gov. Eric Greitens.

I've known for awhile I was on a targeting list for Facebook.

I blame the Republicans: Emancipation, 13-15A, the Civil Rights Act... All GOP-led. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NuDJ39KTmio

 

"Diagnosis Murder," a 1993-to-2001 CBS dramatic series starring the lead actor in what is my vote for the best sit-com of all time, "The Dick Van Dyke Show," portrayed the crime-fighting actions of Dr. Mark Slone, an off-beat but brilliant physician. Though featuring the occasional obligatory Hollyweird liberalism, it was generally a fine program, which I recommend.  In a four - episode story arc carrying over seasons 3 and 4, the show--bias notwithstanding--depicts an all-too-common problem found among many grassroots activist movements: unsophisticated thinking and dumbness in the name of "principle" or such (further characterization omitted). In the story, a very intelligent criminal character, a near-equal to Slone, is using a violent group of such a nature for his own non-ideological enrichment. He engineers the kidnapping of Dr. Slone, with the intent of using his high intellect (yes, played by the same Dick Van Dyke from "Chitty Chitty Bang ...

A difficulty the pro-gun conservative/Right has in combating gun legislation is a purist and libertarian approach. This approach prevents pragmatic actions that could save a great deal of firepower and hamper anti-gun legislative and jurisprudential momentum. This is a mistake from which we must turn . TDF 67 ,   TDF 77  and many other editions discuss the problems behind the libertarian and purist mindsets. They are spoiled brats, ruined by "freedom" and prosperity because they let it turn their minds into an odd form of entitlement--they get what they want, period. Then reality--the demands for gun control by those moderate, neutral, or opposed to gun rights--hits, and they can only act as petulant children. They act to actually handicap efforts to politically mitigate potential anti-gun legislative or judicial efforts ( TDF 25 ). The result: Thinking, function-focused people whose ideas would help the American people are drowned out, and MORE loss of RKBA than was destined...

From the Desk of Donald J. Trump | Donald J. Trump (donaldjtrump.com)   https://www.donaldjtrump.com/desk

  TDF INDEX:  Cats, Guns, and National Security: THE DAILY FUDD index.    https://catsgunsandnationalsecurity.blogspot.com/2021/03/the-daily-fudd-index.html

The "militia" reference in the Second Amendment is in the preambular/"prefatory" clause. Such clauses are statements of aspiration. They are in contrast to "operative" statements, which are the meat and meaningfulness of such a legal statement. It is because of this that to link the Right to Arms to any sort of (government-tied) militia element is incorrect. It is a "right of the PEOPLE"--the common people, which are the constituent parts of Militia. (More on that later.) So the issue arises as to what impact the reference to the Militia should have on 2A interpretation and jurisprudence in terms of black-letter protections and "rights." Setting aside "sophisticated" and "collective rights" interpretations, the technical answer is none. A prefatory clause does not impact on the operative clause's statement. For example, United Nations Resolution 1244, which ended the shooting in the 1990s Kosovo War, explicitly s...