A demonstration of how "freedom" destroys freedom

-
To guarantee equality in what are effectively non-governmental relationships contradicts the right to personally hold others to be different. Freedom of association is the freedom to discriminate.

ADF Seeks Supreme Court Review for Christian Student Groups

Thomas Messner
December 22, 2011 at 11:45 am
Last week the Alliance Defense Fund (ADF) requested review by the U.S. Supreme Court in Alpha Delta Chi v. Reed, a case involving two Christian student organizations at San Diego State University.
According to ADF, San Diego State University denied official recognition to the two Christian organizations because they require members and/or leaders to agree with the organizations' religious beliefs.
To receive official recognition, student organizations are required to abide by a nondiscrimination policy, which includes a prohibition on religious-based discrimination in selecting members and leaders. But this requirement actually discriminates against religious organizations, ADF argues, because it allows secular organizations to require members and leaders to agree with the organization's beliefs but does not allow religious organizations to do the same thing.
...
Indeed, forcing religious organizations to ignore religion in selecting members and leaders is, in general, bad public policy. Intact, cohesive religious groups contribute to socially beneficial forms of diversity that occur naturally in a free and open society. Forcing religious organizations to ignore religious beliefs and commitments of participating individuals would dampen this diversity and trivialize the importance that religion has in the lives of many individuals and organizations.
Further, as ADF argues, such policies "effectively [transform] laws designed to protect individuals and groups from discrimination based on their religion into tools to punish, penalize, and exclude individuals and groups because of their religion." Such policies also put religious groups at a disadvantage by marginalizing the activities and purposes at the core of religious groups without imposing a similar disability on secular groups.
MORE AT LINK

Popular posts from this blog

REFERENCE: (Edited 02 JULY 2026) To followers of the Herbert Armstrong faith tradition.

-
Image
Any desiring to discuss or challenge me on this material can reach me on TruthSocial at @LTWalker03. Scroll down for “True Church” ordinational Succession discussion. — 1960 article where Armstrong states that his public talk approving of listening to teachers outside of his church DOES NOT APPLY TO HIS MEMBERS:  https://www.hwalibrary.com/cgi-bin/get/hwa.cgi?action=getmagazine&InfoID=1324739652&SearchWhat=KeyWord&SearchFor=Should%20we%20listen%20to%20others%201960&NoShow=&page=&return=search 1979 article where Armstrong states that his public talk of, “Don’t believe me; believe your Bible” DOES NOT APPLY TO HIS MEMBERS:  https://www.hwalibrary.com/cgi-bin/get/hwa.cgi?action=getmagazine&InfoID=1374325663&GetMag=GN&byYear=1979&page=&return=magazines Counter to traditional Armstrongist eschewance of Civic Duty:  https://catsgunsandnationalsecurity.blogspot.com/2025/06/reference-counter-to-traditional.html?m=1 Takeoff of Pam Tillis...
Read more

Reference: (Edited 03 JULY 2026) Counter to traditional Armstrongist eschewance of Civic Duty.

-
Armstrongists and others wishing to challenge me may contact me on TruthSocial at @LTWalker03 Though sometimes — actually often — covered up in outreach, original Armstrongist doctrine prohibits members from politics (including voting), military service, and personally bearing arms “for use against humans.” Below is a biblical counter to this. Basic OT Law stands: Deut 4:1-2; 12:32-ch13; 30:1-10 - No adding to or taking from the Law, to which the New Covenant (“circumcision of the heart”) is identical. NT must be read in this context, or NT is false.  Application to matter of Civic Duty (aka, “military service and war”/civil politics):  -  Gen 9:5-6 - Foundation of civil government, and the only positive command in most Noachide codifications. -Gen 14 - No divine disapproval of Abraham’s actions, and no rejection by Melchizedek of the spoils. - Ex 17 - Contrary to Armstrong’s reading, it is a straightforward account of Moses preparing the nation to defend itself, with no ...
Read more

THE DAILY FUDD: E282: “Wheel of Fudd: Article on US military revolvers.”

-
Image
Interesting is that the training manual post World War II seems to allow for individual choice of calibers, plus even single-action revolvers. While standardization is important, I do like the idea of possible use of private firearms in the capacity. https://www.shootingillustrated.com/content/the-evolution-of-military-revolver-training/?fbclid=IwY2xjawMdWBFleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHrOEhoZkhpbXE0dYPVAPw_piYKbXZ4Bmyj8qpovQ6oDjXhvtAOC3io0Ta0p4_aem_0Dd-JTDP_frKAY02wP5xMw Snip More at link above. TDF INDEX:  Cats, Guns, and National Security: THE DAILY FUDD index.    https://catsgunsandnationalsecurity.blogspot.com/2021/03/the-daily-fudd-index.html
Read more