Any desiring to discuss or challenge me on this material can reach me on TruthSocial at @LTWalker03. Scroll down for “True Church” ordinational Succession discussion. — 1960 article where Armstrong states that his public talk approving of listening to teachers outside of his church DOES NOT APPLY TO HIS MEMBERS: https://www.hwalibrary.com/cgi-bin/get/hwa.cgi?action=getmagazine&InfoID=1324739652&SearchWhat=KeyWord&SearchFor=Should%20we%20listen%20to%20others%201960&NoShow=&page=&return=search 1979 article where Armstrong states that his public talk of, “Don’t believe me; believe your Bible” DOES NOT APPLY TO HIS MEMBERS: https://www.hwalibrary.com/cgi-bin/get/hwa.cgi?action=getmagazine&InfoID=1374325663&GetMag=GN&byYear=1979&page=&return=magazines Counter to traditional Armstrongist eschewance of Civic Duty: https://catsgunsandnationalsecurity.blogspot.com/2025/06/reference-counter-to-traditional.html?m=1 Takeoff of Pam Tillis...
Armstrongists and others wishing to challenge me may contact me on TruthSocial at @LTWalker03 Though sometimes — actually often — covered up in outreach, original Armstrongist doctrine prohibits members from politics (including voting), military service, and personally bearing arms “for use against humans.” Below is a biblical counter to this. Basic OT Law stands: Deut 4:1-2; 12:32-ch13; 30:1-10 - No adding to or taking from the Law, to which the New Covenant (“circumcision of the heart”) is identical. NT must be read in this context, or NT is false. Application to matter of Civic Duty (aka, “military service and war”/civil politics): - Gen 9:5-6 - Foundation of civil government, and the only positive command in most Noachide codifications. -Gen 14 - No divine disapproval of Abraham’s actions, and no rejection by Melchizedek of the spoils. - Ex 17 - Contrary to Armstrong’s reading, it is a straightforward account of Moses preparing the nation to defend itself, with no ...
I will let readers look into what happened with Grok on their own. I will discuss here the bigger issue of Jews and persecution. This is not to deny actual antisemites. It is simply to tell why anti-Jewish sentiment can recur and become dominant in a Western society. — Jews as a group have developed a certain persecution complex. It’s not totally un-understandable. However, as a result they will tend to be liberal influences in a host society, even though they themselves would actually identify more with conservatives. They back every identifiable minority to protect their own situation, sometimes play themselves as “POC,” and oppose nationalist movements because they fear such could lead to them being persecuted. As a result, White majorities and Western nationalists can’t help but see the distinct pattern of them being on the other side. This is increased by seeming special protections for that demographic. Yada-yada-yada, at some level, the Jewish population gets put ...