"Did Obama Inadvertently (not my word) Support Jihad in His Egyptian Speech?"

-
This goes back awhile, but is still relevant.

The title includes the word "inadvertently." Feel free to dispense with that qualifier in your responses to the question.

http://visiontoamerica.org/story/did-obama-inadvertently-support-jihad-in-his-egyptian-speech.html
Did Obama Inadvertently Support Jihad in His Egyptian Speech?
visiontoamerica.org
Thanks goes out to another one of our supporters for sending this one in. In Cairo, President Obama promised to ensure Muslims could fulfil "ZAKAT." What is "ZAKAT"? And what are the implications of this promise? Does Barrack Obama know what he is...
2 seconds ago

Popular posts from this blog

REFERENCE: (Edited 02 JULY 2026) To followers of the Herbert Armstrong faith tradition.

-
Image
Any desiring to discuss or challenge me on this material can reach me on TruthSocial at @LTWalker03. Scroll down for “True Church” ordinational Succession discussion. — 1960 article where Armstrong states that his public talk approving of listening to teachers outside of his church DOES NOT APPLY TO HIS MEMBERS:  https://www.hwalibrary.com/cgi-bin/get/hwa.cgi?action=getmagazine&InfoID=1324739652&SearchWhat=KeyWord&SearchFor=Should%20we%20listen%20to%20others%201960&NoShow=&page=&return=search 1979 article where Armstrong states that his public talk of, “Don’t believe me; believe your Bible” DOES NOT APPLY TO HIS MEMBERS:  https://www.hwalibrary.com/cgi-bin/get/hwa.cgi?action=getmagazine&InfoID=1374325663&GetMag=GN&byYear=1979&page=&return=magazines Counter to traditional Armstrongist eschewance of Civic Duty:  https://catsgunsandnationalsecurity.blogspot.com/2025/06/reference-counter-to-traditional.html?m=1 Takeoff of Pam Tillis...
Read more

Reference: (Edited 03 JULY 2026) Counter to traditional Armstrongist eschewance of Civic Duty.

-
Armstrongists and others wishing to challenge me may contact me on TruthSocial at @LTWalker03 Though sometimes — actually often — covered up in outreach, original Armstrongist doctrine prohibits members from politics (including voting), military service, and personally bearing arms “for use against humans.” Below is a biblical counter to this. Basic OT Law stands: Deut 4:1-2; 12:32-ch13; 30:1-10 - No adding to or taking from the Law, to which the New Covenant (“circumcision of the heart”) is identical. NT must be read in this context, or NT is false.  Application to matter of Civic Duty (aka, “military service and war”/civil politics):  -  Gen 9:5-6 - Foundation of civil government, and the only positive command in most Noachide codifications. -Gen 14 - No divine disapproval of Abraham’s actions, and no rejection by Melchizedek of the spoils. - Ex 17 - Contrary to Armstrong’s reading, it is a straightforward account of Moses preparing the nation to defend itself, with no ...
Read more

THE DAILY FUDD: E282: “Wheel of Fudd: Article on US military revolvers.”

-
Image
Interesting is that the training manual post World War II seems to allow for individual choice of calibers, plus even single-action revolvers. While standardization is important, I do like the idea of possible use of private firearms in the capacity. https://www.shootingillustrated.com/content/the-evolution-of-military-revolver-training/?fbclid=IwY2xjawMdWBFleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHrOEhoZkhpbXE0dYPVAPw_piYKbXZ4Bmyj8qpovQ6oDjXhvtAOC3io0Ta0p4_aem_0Dd-JTDP_frKAY02wP5xMw Snip More at link above. TDF INDEX:  Cats, Guns, and National Security: THE DAILY FUDD index.    https://catsgunsandnationalsecurity.blogspot.com/2021/03/the-daily-fudd-index.html
Read more