"Did Obama Inadvertently (not my word) Support Jihad in His Egyptian Speech?"

-
This goes back awhile, but is still relevant.

The title includes the word "inadvertently." Feel free to dispense with that qualifier in your responses to the question.

http://visiontoamerica.org/story/did-obama-inadvertently-support-jihad-in-his-egyptian-speech.html
Did Obama Inadvertently Support Jihad in His Egyptian Speech?
visiontoamerica.org
Thanks goes out to another one of our supporters for sending this one in. In Cairo, President Obama promised to ensure Muslims could fulfil "ZAKAT." What is "ZAKAT"? And what are the implications of this promise? Does Barrack Obama know what he is...
2 seconds ago

Popular posts from this blog

REFERENCE: (Edited 23 AUGUST 2026) To followers of the Herbert Armstrong faith tradition.

-
Image
Any desiring to discuss or challenge me on this material can reach me on TruthSocial at @LTWalker03. Scroll down for “True Church” ordinational Succession discussion. — 1960 article where Armstrong states that his public talk approving of listening to teachers outside of his church DOES NOT APPLY TO HIS MEMBERS:  https://www.hwalibrary.com/cgi-bin/get/hwa.cgi?action=getmagazine&InfoID=1324739652&SearchWhat=KeyWord&SearchFor=Should%20we%20listen%20to%20others%201960&NoShow=&page=&return=search 1979 article where Armstrong states that his public talk of, “Don’t believe me; believe your Bible” DOES NOT APPLY TO HIS MEMBERS:  https://www.hwalibrary.com/cgi-bin/get/hwa.cgi?action=getmagazine&InfoID=1374325663&GetMag=GN&byYear=1979&page=&return=magazines Counter to traditional Armstrongist eschewance of Civic Duty:  https://catsgunsandnationalsecurity.blogspot.com/2025/06/reference-counter-to-traditional.html?m=1 Takeoff of Pam Tillis...
Read more

Reference: (Edited 21 AUGUST 2026) Counter to traditional Armstrongist eschewance of Civic Duty.

-
Image
Armstrongists and others wishing to challenge me may contact me on TruthSocial at @LTWalker03 Though sometimes — actually often — covered up in outreach, original Armstrongist doctrine prohibits members from politics (including voting), military service, and personally bearing arms “for use against humans.” Below is a counter to  The traditional Armstrongist scriptural approaches and takes on the matter. . Basic OT Law stands: Deut 4:1-2; 12:32-ch13; 30:1-10 - No adding to or taking from the Law, to which the New Covenant (“circumcision of the heart”) is identical. NT must be read in this context, or NT is false.  Application to matter of Civic Duty (aka, “military service and war”/civil politics):  -  Gen 9:5-6 - Foundation of civil government, and the only positive command in most Noachide codifications. -Gen 14 - No divine disapproval of Abraham’s actions, and no rejection by Melchizedek of the spoils. - Ex 17 - Contrary to Armstrong’s reading, it is a straightfor...
Read more

CGNS fun with AI — cats, guns, and “knights” of various eras.

-
Image
By Meta AI through Facebook Messenger. Armor, guns, and cats, with Warhammer 40K-inspiration (in progress). ( These next two below are not my work, but were sent to me for a slightly different project.)   Then it finally occurred to me that there was no way I would ever get a cat to wear a gas mask! —— A few intermediate steps I found interesting. And one stolen, the only change being the sword changed to a rifle barrel. One added, improved version of one above: Better background. Removed loose-hanging hose. It is a flaw in the original W40K design. The smart way would be to have the hose more closely clamped to the body. It would still permit free movement of the head.  I like this backpack design, even with the exposed tube or two. Needs a better image of the soldier. O D Dedese   UL: Uses original bag, but hangs low. UR: Hangs higher, but cat has no forward view. LL: Forward view and cargo carriage, but large and dome looks odd. LR: Forward view and cargo carriage, but...
Read more