Cats, Guns, and National Security

Here's what happened regarding comms around Trump Tower meeting: The calls are irrelevant, since as Shitt noted, comms could have been done face to face. Trump Jr probably did communicate to his father he had Hillary dirt involving Russia coming, but didn't mention meeting: 1. Plausible deniability; 2. Common corporate practice of not overloading with details. This is why Trump made announcement of forthcoming dirt. Comms after, by whatever means, were that Don Jr had come up empty, with no reference in that context to a meeting (same reasons). This is why Trump cancelled that announcement. Most likely the meeting was referenced in some vague way at some time, but in context of Magnitsky. Trump noted when the story came out he recalled Magnitsky being a topic at the time, and wondered himself if he had had some knowledge. Call it "fog of war."

AN HISTORICAL COMPARISON: Remington Model 8 (top) and Winchester 1907. The Remington was probably the better combat rifle (especially when in the Model 81 layout), but the Winchester is better looking. That might account for the latter's prim use in the television show, "The Son," but if that's why France and Russia in World War 1 opted for it for air use, then it's no wonder Russia lost and France needed us to bail them out. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remington_Model_8 ===================================== https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winchester_Model_1907 -------------------------- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winchester_Model_1910

Only real mistake in this is that humans did not do the domestication. Rather cats domesticated THEMSELVES .  

ETERNAL (When the time comes that I can't care for a cat and bear arms, there is no life left.) CURRENT ACTIVIST FOCUS ========================================================== ("My Kitty, My Carry Piece, and Me") ---------------------------------------------------------------------- (BONUS 😁:)

Donald Trump Jr. tweeted about the article below: "Now winning is sexist. When will the bs end?" -- https://twitter.com/DonaldJTrump…/status/1052014305481089024 MY BRILLIANT COMMENTARY: What she's saying falls in on the "meritocracy is racist" concept. When an objective and legitimate measure yields results that uphold traditional White/Western structure, they are "racist" or "sexist" or whatever. Not that the measure is twisted, but that the approach yields results that oppose their agenda. PC makes it hard to say it, but the truth is that meritocracy--a system where advancement is based on how OBJECTIVELY good one is--bears out that races are different and sexes are different. That, of course, implies aggregate qualitative differences between demographics, and that's "[INSERT CATEGORY HERE]-ist"--at least when noted by someone on the conservative/Right. Yet the facts are the facts--even if they are "hate facts....