Cats, Guns, and National Security

Previous version here: http://catsgunsandnationalsecurity.blogspot.com/2018/03/further-expanded-my-crazy-idea-for.html Being functionally focused when it comes to our rights, I take theologian Peter Marshall's approach of seeing freedom as the ability to do what is right, not entitlement to do simply what we want. Thus, here's my suggestion for resolving the whole "assault weapon" debate.  It's not ideal, but politics are always iffy, and it's better than a catastrophic loss of the Second Amendment.  Click to enlarge or save to computer.

Previous version here:  http://catsgunsandnationalsecurity.blogspot.com/2018/03/expanded-my-crazy-idea-for-resolving.html Being functionally focused when it comes to our rights, I take theologian Peter Marshall's approach of seeing freedom as the ability to do what is right, not entitlement to do simply what we want. Thus, here's my suggestion for resolving the whole "assault weapon" debate.  It's not ideal, but politics are always iffy, and it's better than a catastrophic loss of the Second Amendment. 

Save to computer and enlarge for easier reading.

Without my usual vitriole. Save to computer, then open and enlarge for easier reading.

Being functionally focused when it comes to our rights, I take theologian Peter Marshall's approach of seeing freedom as the ability to do what is right, not entitlement to do simply what we want. Thus, here's my suggestion for resolving the whole "assault weapon" debate.  It's not ideal, but politics are always iffy, and it's better than a catastrophic loss of the Second Amendment.  See also:  https://catsgunsandnationalsecurity.blogspot.com/2018/03/slightly-modified-my-crazy-idea-for.html Save to computer, then open and enlarge for easier reading. 

Save to computer, then open and enlarge for easier reading.

EXPANDED VERSION HERE: http://catsgunsandnationalsecurity.blogspot.com/2018/03/expanded-my-crazy-idea-for-resolving.html Being functionally focused when it comes to our rights, I take theologian Peter Marshall's approach of seeing freedom as the ability to do what is right, not entitlement to do simply what we want. Thus, here's my suggestion for resolving the whole "assault weapon" debate.  It's not ideal, but politics are always iffy, and it's better than a catastrophic loss of the Second Amendment.  (Original here: http://catsgunsandnationalsecurity.blogspot.com/2018/02/my-crazy-idea-for-resolving-assault.html ) BASIS : From "7 Terrible Liberal Gun Control Arguments ... And How To Beat Them," by Kurt Schlichter -- https://t.co/ezzv0uHNAG