Lester Holt -- The Candy Crowley of 2016

Lester Holt's "The record show otherwise" line regarding Trump's position on the Iraq War was not a fact-check. It was a conclusion. It constituted shilling for Hillary. 

Thank you Senator @TedCruz!#Debates2016 #MAGA pic.twitter.com/cgO6109USJ

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 27, 2016

Debate sexism is where the moderator only fights 50% harder for the female and leaves it partly up to her to tangle with the big scary man. pic.twitter.com/y71cupJyOh

— Hillary PR Team (@OnMessageForHer) September 27, 2016

When the 'moderator' jumps in, protecting one side while they lie, it's not a debate.
It's a roast.
We won't pretend otherwise.#Debates

— Linda Suhler, Ph.D. (@LindaSuhler) September 27, 2016

"The record shows otherwise." Crowleyism makes an appearance. Mistake ... https://t.co/1jNpHaGVY0

— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey) September 27, 2016

More data on Lester Holt's performance: https://t.co/9LSO8jJGDa

— Breitbart News (@BreitbartNews) September 27, 2016

.@LesterHoltNBC emerges from debate bruised and partisan https://t.co/sbDx8OFnrS #debates

— Newt Gingrich (@newtgingrich) September 27, 2016

Holt's "record shows otherwise" line was conclusion, not factcheck. You've got to hand it to Trump(by Vic Berger IV) https://t.co/q0dOj71sEy

— Deplorable LTW (@TgGRA) September 27, 2016