Thursday, June 15, 2023
Maybe a few “faithful wounds,” but with HUGE failure by Intel guy regarding Trump’s strategy.
This is entirely about about the CIA dude’s assessment. His key error is that Trump got MORE votes in 2020 than in 2016!
It’s funny, the more I think about it. Such a simple and undisputed fact completely destroys an intelligence professional’s assessment. I did military intelligence analysis in the Army. An obvious error like his would have completely killed my credibility. Even my presentation of facts would have been questioned. I know he was an operative, and not an analyst. No excuse, he should know better.
Firing Blacks would be better compensation — ARTICLE: “Court Rules White Starbucks Manager Was Fired Because Of Her Race, Awards Her $25M.”
Phillips said one of her superiors, a black woman, ordered her to suspend Benjamin Trinsey — a white manager — because of racial discrimination allegations against him that claimed he paid ethnic minorities less than white employees. Phillips argued Trinsey was not racist and did not have a say in employees’ wages. Still, Phillips followed the directive and suspended Trinsey. Two days later, she was fired.
So there’s actually another side to this. This White woman was a race traitor who took part in the war against her people. She actually fired an innocent White man. Bitch deserved to get her ass kicked in some way, and it’s hilarious that her treason didn’t buy her any favor. That said, it is still a matter of a race war, so it’s good that she won this case.
In contrast, Phillips said that the black manager of the Rittenhouse Square store had faced no disciplinary action. Around the same time, Paul Sykes, a black district manager under Phillips, faced numerous complaints concerning his management style. While the coffee giant investigated Trinsey and suspended him, it did not investigate Sykes.
Now, Starbucks needs to fire a bunch of Black people to make up for the White people who were fired.
Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Liberals love terrorism — ARTICLE: “Democrat Who Equated Muslims With White Supremacists Apologizes.”
Such comparisons are made to White conservative groups all the time, with no apologies. But when it comes to a theo-political construct at war with Western civilization, this radical, who has expressed extreme anti-White sentiments, immediately cowers.
“Even when individuals disagree about difficult issues, I am committed to finding space to foster authentic dialogue and seek points of understanding. I sat down to hear from Muslim community members before my remarks on Tuesday and with District 5 Muslim leaders on Thursday. I listened, and I understand their concerns,” she stated, adding that she looked forward to working with both Muslim and LGBTQ communities to tackle issues.
Granted, White conservatives are far less likely to chop her head off.
“Dialogue” and “seek[ing] points of understanding” only applies to agendas seeking to destroy us.
Prior to becoming a councilwoman, Mink resigned from a left-wing organization dubbed “Lights for Liberty” in 2019, reportedly telling her former colleagues in an email the organization was “too white” on the executive level for her liking.
…
Arguing that white women serving as representatives for the organization would lead to a credibility issue, Mink further went on to argue that speakers for the organization’s events needed to be “intersectional and multi-racial. White people… should be few and with good reason,” Mink stated, according to the outlet.
(Emphasis added.)
Complete enemy of our people
Monday, June 12, 2023
VIDEO: “50s Housewife Meets Modern Woman.”
MY COMMENT: “The writing is a bit condensed, but understandably, so, but it brings out now”—that is, just how disgusting the concept they are displaying there is. Truly, in conservatives’ effort to hold to “freedom,” to many have lost the simple recognition that the “other side” is simply disgusting. But it will continue to exist and spread and to destroy society so long as that “Freedom” is it opponents’ priority.
“I could explain how to resolve it, but that would probably violate YouTube bias.”
Answer: Ban it.
Answer: Ban it.