Cats, Guns, and National Security

ETERNAL (When the time comes that I can't care for a cat and bear arms, there is no life left.) CURRENT ACTIVIST FOCUS ========================================================== ("My Kitty, My Carry Piece, and Me") ---------------------------------------------------------------------- (BONUS 😁:)

Donald Trump Jr. tweeted about the article below: "Now winning is sexist. When will the bs end?" -- https://twitter.com/DonaldJTrump…/status/1052014305481089024 MY BRILLIANT COMMENTARY: What she's saying falls in on the "meritocracy is racist" concept. When an objective and legitimate measure yields results that uphold traditional White/Western structure, they are "racist" or "sexist" or whatever. Not that the measure is twisted, but that the approach yields results that oppose their agenda. PC makes it hard to say it, but the truth is that meritocracy--a system where advancement is based on how OBJECTIVELY good one is--bears out that races are different and sexes are different. That, of course, implies aggregate qualitative differences between demographics, and that's "[INSERT CATEGORY HERE]-ist"--at least when noted by someone on the conservative/Right. Yet the facts are the facts--even if they are "hate facts....

This is literally all that "Trump-Russia" nuts have: Because it's a clever story, it should be investigated. That would describe most UFO/alien stories, except that most of them have more actual evidence. From " A Second Look at the Steele Dossier": h ttps://www.justsecurity.org/44697/steele-dossier-knowing/

TRUMP'S CLARIFICATION AND CORRECTION: President Trump: “I don’t see any reason why it wouldn’t be Russia… We are doing everything in our power to prevent Russian interference in 2018.” pic.twitter.com/ddJcGiJoGI — The White House (@WhiteHouse) July 17, 2018 WATCH VIDEO! Mark Levin Sounds Off on 'Psychopaths' in The Media: 'They've Had More Positions on Russia Than Stormy Daniels' https://t.co/lgei1B8CHk via @mediaite — Lee Walker (@TgGRA) July 19, 2018 "At that moment in Helsinki, for Mr. Trump, the question of choosing between Vladimir Putin (ex-KGB despot) and Mr. Trump’s own experience of being set up, framed and relentlessly persecuted by the American “intelligence community” to this day, must have felt like the choice between Scylla and Charybdis. Either would destroy him, and no matter what he said, the Left would shriek the sky is falling yet again." T rump Has Been Set Up, Framed And Relentlessly Persecuted By The Am...

In honor of the tenth anniversary of the Heller 2A SCOTUS decision. Let us be mindful of the situation the Right to Arms faces--and the special function it serves in our time. https://twitter.com/TgGRA/status/1011642193969405952

Just one of many like this I've done.

"Genius is a journey as much as a state of intellectual standing." -- Me 3-PANEL PRESENTATION :   ==================================================================== "LEAN AND TRIM" SINGLE PANEL :   ==================================================================== PLUSSED UP "LEAN AND TRIM" SINGLE PANEL :   ==================================================================== APPENDICES (supporting information not formatted) :

. Adds the tactical assessment behind the three recommendations for goals.

Click on and save to computer to open and enlarge for easier reading.

My "third way" Second Amendment advocacy approach, which considers the issue from the proper perspective--not "rights" (pro-gun) or "disarmament" (anti-gun), but rather from the amendment's own stated function of Militia efficacy--is down to three main panels and two appendices! (Might add an icon or two later.) APPENDICES

"Rights don't depend on 'need'" doesn't quite work. So here's the answer.

These approach the matter from different angles. Thus, sometimes the language or sense won't be a hundred percent in sync. None of these has ever been intended to be the answer to everything, but merely a resolution to a key point of contention. 

Click to enlarge. Save to computer to enlarge for easier reading. 

Previous version here: http://catsgunsandnationalsecurity.blogspot.com/2018/03/further-expanded-my-crazy-idea-for.html Being functionally focused when it comes to our rights, I take theologian Peter Marshall's approach of seeing freedom as the ability to do what is right, not entitlement to do simply what we want. Thus, here's my suggestion for resolving the whole "assault weapon" debate.  It's not ideal, but politics are always iffy, and it's better than a catastrophic loss of the Second Amendment.  Click to enlarge or save to computer.

Previous version here:  http://catsgunsandnationalsecurity.blogspot.com/2018/03/expanded-my-crazy-idea-for-resolving.html Being functionally focused when it comes to our rights, I take theologian Peter Marshall's approach of seeing freedom as the ability to do what is right, not entitlement to do simply what we want. Thus, here's my suggestion for resolving the whole "assault weapon" debate.  It's not ideal, but politics are always iffy, and it's better than a catastrophic loss of the Second Amendment. 

Save to computer and enlarge for easier reading.

Without my usual vitriole. Save to computer, then open and enlarge for easier reading.

Being functionally focused when it comes to our rights, I take theologian Peter Marshall's approach of seeing freedom as the ability to do what is right, not entitlement to do simply what we want. Thus, here's my suggestion for resolving the whole "assault weapon" debate.  It's not ideal, but politics are always iffy, and it's better than a catastrophic loss of the Second Amendment.  See also:  https://catsgunsandnationalsecurity.blogspot.com/2018/03/slightly-modified-my-crazy-idea-for.html Save to computer, then open and enlarge for easier reading. 

Save to computer, then open and enlarge for easier reading.

EXPANDED VERSION HERE: http://catsgunsandnationalsecurity.blogspot.com/2018/03/expanded-my-crazy-idea-for-resolving.html Being functionally focused when it comes to our rights, I take theologian Peter Marshall's approach of seeing freedom as the ability to do what is right, not entitlement to do simply what we want. Thus, here's my suggestion for resolving the whole "assault weapon" debate.  It's not ideal, but politics are always iffy, and it's better than a catastrophic loss of the Second Amendment.  (Original here: http://catsgunsandnationalsecurity.blogspot.com/2018/02/my-crazy-idea-for-resolving-assault.html ) BASIS : From "7 Terrible Liberal Gun Control Arguments ... And How To Beat Them," by Kurt Schlichter -- https://t.co/ezzv0uHNAG