Noteworthy discussion about how this will affect future court efforts, but the affirmative ruling here does more good than harm:
1. Hits a key practical function, which is far more important.
2. Allows for sweeping rulings.
McCarthy does raise the point that the Court is saying you have to change the Constitution to affect 2A. The only downside--and this goes to literally any pro-gun development--is that extreme anti-gunners can use them to argue for amending 2A. Keep that in mind.
1. Hits a key practical function, which is far more important.
2. Allows for sweeping rulings.
McCarthy does raise the point that the Court is saying you have to change the Constitution to affect 2A. The only downside--and this goes to literally any pro-gun development--is that extreme anti-gunners can use them to argue for amending 2A. Keep that in mind.
See also TDF 68 for matter of requiring permits at all.
