Animal and pet food recalls.

https://www.fda.gov/safety/recalls-market-withdrawals-safety-alerts/adm-animal-nutrition-recalls-select-pen-palsr-chicken-feed-moormans-showtec-swine-feed-ampt-cattle

—-

https://www.fda.gov/safety/recalls-market-withdrawals-safety-alerts/adm-animal-nutrition-expands-recall-include-17-additional-lots-chicken-swine-and-rabbit-feed

—-

https://www.fda.gov/safety/recalls-market-withdrawals-safety-alerts/cargill-conducts-voluntary-recall-nutrenar-country-feedsr-meatbird-22-crumble-due-non-inclusion

Misogyny is the answer — VIDEO SHORT: “Man gets bashed for NOT looking at woman at gym 🙄.”

We should never have let women have the franchise.

Yes, the Globalist/Left is simply about destroying US.

If this traitor had added the word, “White,” it would have been complete.

In any case, he says enough to make it clear that we are justified in completely suppressing his movement.

Not seeing the big deal here – Israelis mistakenly nail “humanitarian” convoy in Gaza.

I got no problem with what happened. I’m the guy who advocates giving the Israelis some B-52s and letting them carpetbomb.

The guy in the video is just a bit wimpy here, but he tells the story.

MY COMMENT: “The way to stop this is for Hamas to surrender and for Gazans submit to Israeli rule. Remember what started this back in October. This is nothing.”

Article from Revolver News discussing conspiracy theories and unintended impacts.

For the uninitiated, Revolver News is so good that Facebook has blocked on only the posting of articles from it, but even the sending of them in private messages. In this article, they perhaps ironically argues somewhat against runaway conspiracy theories.

TN Republicans who passed anti-chemtrail bill may have just accidentally opened a Pandora’s Box that could hurt US farmers…

Vaguely related article by yours truly: 

A CAUTIONARY NOTE IN SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS: "Coincidences do happen," or, "How Super Password gives pause to conspiracy theories."

This is a good thing: VIDEO: “Kathy Griffin Has NERVOUS BREAKDOWN at HUGE MAGA Rally Outside Her Show | 'I'm Literally Shaking' 🤣.”

“New Rules,” you know. Play their rules against them – and a hell of a lot more. They hurt us, so we get to hurt them – and a hell of a lot more.

Sharyl Attkisson article on “ranked voting,” and my commentary.

https://fullmeasure.news/newest-videos/the-vote

The commentary below is adapted from posts on TruthSocial replying to Attkisson’s posting of the article there: 

The problem with the opposition to ranked voting is that it’s really just a complaint about and fear of third-party presence and/or multiple candidates from the same party being on the ballot. 

However, disregarding the matter of the motivation, the argument presented is simply opposition to requiring an actual majority, rather than plurality, for an election win. That’s fine. But make THAT argument. Don’t blame having an instant run off system.

The Republican loss in Alaska under the system was because too many Republicans apparently would rather have the Democrat than Sarah Palin. Otherwise, they could simply have voted Begich as their first choice, and Palin as their second, giving Palin the victory. It would be no different had the runoff been held a few weeks later.  Maybe they hated her that much. Or maybe they were just too stupid to know how to rank choices.

Support or oppose it, whichever. But be honest with the reason.

——

From the report:  

(American Enterprise Institute representative) Ganz: “The problem with ranked choice voting is that you don’t end up electing the candidate whose preferences are aligned with the median. It has this extremist bias. It has a tendency towards electing candidates who are further to the left or further to the right.”

In other words, folks, the conservative opposes the idea because it weakens the establishment. And yes, it can support movements to the RIGHT. Think about it.

It really comes down to dumb Teabrainery. See also: https://catsgunsandnationalsecurity.blogspot.com/2022/09/faithful-wound-time-republican-critics.html?m=1