Gregg Jarrett: Comey's revenge is a gun without powder | https://t.co/tHg9McXDVi— Deplorable LTW (@TgGRA) May 17, 2017
The Comey memo offers no proof for impeachment of Trump https://t.co/3wsYieI6sM— Deplorable LTW (@TgGRA) May 17, 2017
— Deplorable LTW (@TgGRA) May 17, 2017
The latest on #ComeyMemo by @ToryAnarchist (@hughhewitt , @RealClearNews , @hotairblog , @instapundit) https://t.co/SPfdZo64oU— National Interest (@TheNatlInterest) May 17, 2017
11 Essential, Unanswered Questions on Comey Memo, NYT Report https://t.co/jXJNS1v8SJ via @LifeZette— Laura Ingraham (@IngrahamAngle) May 17, 2017
Legal Experts: Trump’s Flynn Advocacy Not Obstruction of Justice https://t.co/F5d8IVWis9 via @LifeZette— Laura Ingraham (@IngrahamAngle) May 17, 2017
NOT Trump fans. Club for Growth President:Trump did nothing wrong by 'directing' Comey on FBI investigation of Flynn https://t.co/MvtjnTrvPb— Deplorable LTW (@TgGRA) May 17, 2017
Experts: No Case Against Trump - Breitbart https://t.co/GgJytiu7mS— ✨Females For Trump✨ (@FemalesForTrump) May 17, 2017
The Left’s Reckless Rush to Judgment on Obstruction of Justice https://t.co/X6QUbkvslj— Deplorable LTW (@TgGRA) May 19, 2017
The president's power to end a criminal investigation. My weekend @NRO column - https://t.co/N1N7P8RN2E— Andrew C. McCarthy (@AndrewCMcCarthy) May 20, 2017
And then, there's this side of the whole matter: Trump may have said something to that effect or such, but out of honesty and concern, not authority or threat.
Fox's Rosen makes a point haven't heard yet: Good defense lawyer would say there's a big difference between "I hope" & "I order you" #Flynn— Joe Concha (@JoeConchaTV) May 16, 2017
(Maybe a bit presumptuous on what happened, but point made.)
News Flash, @realDonaldTrump hoping @JamesComeyFBI cuts @MikeFlynn some slack because he is a 'good man' is not close to #Obstruction— Geraldo Rivera (@GeraldoRivera) May 17, 2017
#Impeachment talk is lazy, uninformed & reckless-Still no underlying crime. #ComeyMemo does not spell out #Obstruction @POTUS has rights too— Geraldo Rivera (@GeraldoRivera) May 17, 2017
And one thought sums it up:
@TheNatlInterest @hughhewitt @ToryAnarchist @RealClearNews @hotairblog @instapundit Yes. Overlook an Obama/Clinton crime spree then talk impeachment over something trivial Trump might have said, it's MADNESS.— Bill Bradbrooke 🇺🇸 (@billbradbrooke) May 17, 2017
I'll say this here: Whatever was said, if anything, might have been nothing more than a heartfelt expression of hope about a friend made by a new President who had, until less than a month before, never been subject to the intricate legal, ethical, and political nuances of nuances of such a public office. Would it make sense to take down President Trump for being too NICE about someone?
We have a system for examining and adjudicating such matters. We shall see what happens.
