The things that matter in life.

The things that matter in life.
The things that matter in life.

Thursday, August 25, 2016

Trump Campaign Statement: CLINTON CAMPAIGN: IF YOU DON’T LIKE THE CLINTON FOUNDATION, DON’T VOTE FOR CLINTON

This one is too good, folks. Instead of distancing Hillary from the scandal, this crazy spokesidiot makes the controversy part and parcel of Hillary's campaign.

Fails like this happen to campaigns on both sides. Even though happening to the other side, it still gives me a cringe.







- August 25, 2016 -

CLINTON CAMPAIGN: IF YOU DON’T LIKE THE CLINTON FOUNDATION, DON’T VOTE FOR CLINTON

If The Clinton Campaign Wants Voters Who Dislike The Corrupt Clinton Foundation To Vote Against Clinton, Polling Suggest There Will Be A Problem

SHOT – Yesterday The Clinton Campaign Said Voters Shouldn’t Vote For Clinton If They Have An Issue With The Foundation:
Yesterday Clinton Spokesperson Brian Fallon Said If You Had Issues With The Clinton Foundation, “Then Don't Vote For Her.” “Clinton spokesman Brian Fallon defended the foundation and the work that it does on ‘Morning Joe,’ saying more than half of the people in the world receiving AIDS drugs got them from the Clinton Foundation. ‘So no, the Clinton Foundation will not be completely shuttering its work even if Clinton wins the presidency and for good reason, they want to continue this work,’ Fallon added. ‘If any American voter is troubled by the idea that the Clintons want to keep working to solve the AIDS crisis on the side while Hillary Clinton is president, then don't vote for her.’” (Rebecca Savransky, “Scarborough Calls Clinton Camp Defense Of Foundation 'Pathetic',” The Hill, 8/25/16)
CHASER – The Illegality Of The Clinton Foundation Has Left It Woefully Unpopular Among Voters:
A Poll Released Last Week Found The Perception Of The Clinton Foundation Is “Generally Negative,” With More Voters Holding A Negative Than Positive View. “The public has heard quite a bit about The Clinton Foundation, founded by Bill Clinton in 1997 after he left the White House, and the perception is generally negative when compared with other well-known charities. More than half of voters (51 percent) have heard a lot or some about the foundation, and while one-third of voters view it favorably, almost four in 10 (38 percent) have an unfavorable view.” (Cameron Easley, “The Clinton Foundation Has A Perception Problem, Poll Shows,” Morning Consult, 8/19/16)
More Voters Believe The Clinton Foundation “Is A Mostly Political Organization That Raises And Spends Money To Further The Interests Of The Clinton Family” Than A Charity That “Raises And Spends Money To Provide Help For Those In Need.” “Voters’ negative views of the foundation appear to be rooted in how it is perceived: While 29 percent of voters say the foundation’s purpose is mostly charitable in that it raises and spends money to provide help for those in need, almost four in 10 voters (36 percent) say it is a mostly political organization that raises and spends money to further the interests of the Clinton family.” (Cameron Easley, “The Clinton Foundation Has A Perception Problem, Poll Shows,” Morning Consult, 8/19/16)
“A Fair Amount Of Voters Are Also Suspicious Of The Influence That Foreign Interests May Have Had On Clinton During Her Tenure As Secretary Of State.” (Cameron Easley, “The Clinton Foundation Has A Perception Problem, Poll Shows,” Morning Consult, 8/19/16)
55 Percent Of Voters Believe Clinton Was Influenced By Donors To Her Foundation From Outside The U.S., With 34 Percent Saying She Was “Influenced A Lot.” “A little over one-third (34 percent) of respondents said she was influenced a lot by donors outside the U.S. when she was secretary of State, and about one-fifth (21 percent) said foreign donors had some influence on her.” (Cameron Easley, “The Clinton Foundation Has A Perception Problem, Poll Shows,” Morning Consult, 8/19/16)


UPDATE: