Saturday, March 17, 2012

From ACT! for America--Houston: [New post] Why Can’t Non-Muslims Criticize Islam?

Islam is an inherently violent, jihad-focused spirituality. "Moderate" Muslims indeed exist--as do homosexual Christians, Shabbot-breaking observant Jews, and alcohol-drinking Sikhs.  They may be sincere, decent people, and possibly even worthy allies in GWOT, but they are frankly at odds with their professed faith.

Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2012 12:14 PM
Subject: [New post] Why Can't Non-Muslims Criticize Islam?

New post on ACT! for America Houston

Why Can't Non-Muslims Criticize Islam?

by witnesstojihad
This is the flag of the Organization of Islamic Co-operation, a 57 member group that is the largest voting block at the United Nations. The primary goal of the OIC is to ensure the voices of the Ummah (the worldwide ISlamic community) is heard. In effect this means the organizations aim is the establishment of [...]
.
Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://actforamericahouston.wordpress.com/2012/03/17/why-cant-non-muslims-criticize-islam/

Friday, March 16, 2012

A weeklong demonstration that national defense is more important than the economy

-
In a nod to my predilection for pop-culture references, the preeminence of national security and worldwide military power over a desire for a "strong economy" is illustrated in the weeklong 1987 ABC mini-series, Amerika.  I urge all of my loyal and devoted readers--and everyone else, for that matter--to read the description.  A nation can lead the world in economic power, but lose it all to a few EMPs, especially when its people are apathetic to national security needs.
-
But..., but..., but aren't we told, "Military security and economic security go hand in hand"?  Bullshit.  The problem with this maxim is that it is an excuse for defense spending cut proposals by Tea Partiers and a concession to that conservative/Teabrainer political reality by patriots.
-
The truth of "Guns, then butter" goes back to our friend the caveman.  If Ugg-Ugg the caveman makes a harvest tool from a tree and his cousin Ugg makes a club from a tree, then Ugg ultimately ends up with the club, the harvest tool, and the harvested food, and Ugg-Ugg ends up as an impoverished slave of Ugg, doing the actual harvesting with the tool he made (and taking it any trees Ugg-Ugg may have, at the height of his "economic" power, planted). Ugg-Ugg will have handed Ugg his "strong economy," with no visible hope of ever getting it back.
-
Moral of the story: Guns, then butter!
-
-
"Just tell me how much fuel and ammo are gonna cost, and I'm done with economic matters."
--Me. 
 
 

From NRA: Freedom Times, Issue no. 71


 
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 2:00 PM
Subject: Freedom Times, Issue no. 71
Having trouble viewing this e-mail? Click here to view in your browser.

Issue No. 71
March 2012
 

Gun rights lawsuits take aim at Illinois, Chicago
By Dahleen Glanton, Chicago Tribune
At least nine separate lawsuits targeting Chicago, Cook County and Illinois are working their way through the courts, most of them backed by the National Rifle Association, which is pouring financial resources and political clout into efforts to loosen gun laws across the country...
Prosecutors recently sentenced a Texas man, Manuel Barba, for trafficking a weapon connected to the murder of Immigration and Customs (ICE) Agent Jaime Zapata...

Rep. Darrell Issa on the Latest with Eric Holder and Fast and Furious
NRAVideos

Ginny Simone talks to Congressman Darrell Issa (R-CA) about Eric Holder and Fast and Furious...
Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel is reportedly turning up the heat on his anti-gun crusade.  Emanuel's anti-gun efforts are focused on two bills that can best be described as attempts to use punitive taxes and warranted bureaucratic fees to discourage Illinois residents from exercising their Second Amendment rights...

McDonnell signs repeal of one-gun-a-month law
By Olympia Meola, Richmond Times Dispatch (VA)
Gov. Bob McDonnell signed a bill Tuesday to overturn Virginia's landmark one-handgun-a-month law, a restriction put on the books in the early 1990s when gun trafficking was seen as a problem along the East Coast...

Number of Ohioans legally carrying concealed firearms is still rising
By Reginald Fields, Cleveland Plain Dealer (OH)
The number of Ohioans who have licenses to legally carry concealed firearms has more than doubled in the past three years, according to figures from the Ohio Attorney General's Office...

Gun owners win a round
By Emily Miller, Washington Times
After four years of trying to hide from the Supreme Court's Heller decision, Washington realized its gun laws had to change. On Tuesday, the D.C. Council voted unanimously to relax firearm registration requirements...

12 states on path to guns with no permits
By Jonathan Ellis, USA Today
Legislatures in a dozen states are considering laws that would eliminate requirements that residents obtain permits to carry concealed weapons...


To ensure delivery of Freedom Times emails to your inbox, please add admin@nramedia.org to your Email Address Book or Safe List.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
NRA HomeNRA On You TubeFollow us on TwitterNRA on FacebookForward to a Friend

Thursday, March 15, 2012

GREAT ANTI-ISLAM AD!! -- Article from ACT! for America--Houston: Hypocrisy & Sharia Compliance from the New York Times

It is a knock-off on an anti-Catholic ad the New York Times accepted from the Freedom From Religion Foundation.  Yet the NYT rejected this ad.  I would wonder why, except that it's obvious: Muslims are inherently violent and would react violently to this appeal to their weaker elements.  See also http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2012/03/counter-jihad-offense-afdisioa-counters-new-york-times-anti-catholic-ad-with-same-only-accurate.html
NYTIMESISLAMADboldLatest

Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 8:09 PM
Subject: [New post] Hypocrisy & Sharia Compliance from the New York Times

New post on ACT! for America Houston

Hypocrisy & Sharia Compliance from the New York Times

by witnesstojihad
National Review is reporting that the New York Times has rejected a full-page anti-Islam advertisement sponsored by anti-jihad activist and blogger – and AFLC client – Pamela Geller. The ad was a mimicry of a vile and offensive full-page anti-Catholic ad published by the Times last week and sponsored by the atheist Freedom from Religion Foundation. [...]
witnesstojihad | March 15, 2012 at 7:09 pm | Tags: Civilization jihad | Categories: Censorship, Dhimmitude, Islam, Jihad, Muslim Brotherhood, Muslim intimidation, Pamela Geller, Political Correctness, Religion of Peace | URL: http://wp.me/p1ggVf-1P7
 
Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://actforamericahouston.wordpress.com/2012/03/15/hypocrisy-sharia-compliance-from-the-new-york-times/

From ACT! for America: Assembly of Muslim Jurists of America's goal

I wonder if Pennsylvania's "Judge Jihadi" Mark Martin is a member.  At the very least, he needs to be an honored speaker at one of their little gatherings.


Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 12:31 PM
Subject: Assembly of Muslim Jurists of America's goal
homelearnactdonatelocal chaptersContact Congress
ACT! for America

March 15, 2012

AMJA's goal: replacing our Constitution with sharia law

Dear Lee,

The enablers of radical Islam in government, academia and the media regularly dismiss warnings like ours. They have either never heard of, don't want to know about, or don't want you to know about, the Assembly of Muslim Jurists of America (AMJA).

When you read the eye-popping column below (highlights added), posted by our friend Andrew Bostom, you'll be reminded why the willful blindness of the enablers of radical Islam is so dangerous.

We take little comfort in the ruling of an AMJA jurist (quoted below), who writes (referring to the Muslim community in America): "The Islamic community does not possess the strength to engage in offensive jihad at this time."



Mainstream American Muslim Jurists' Blueprint for Undermining America's Legal System

Posted By Andrew Bostom On March 14, 2012

http://www.andrewbostom.org/blog/2012/03/14/mainstream-american-muslim-jurists-blueprint-for-undermining-americas-legal-system/



Salah al-Sawy, mainstream AMJA "jurist", expresses his patriotic views on US citizenship:

As for obtaining citizenships in light of circumstances of Muslims today who are residing outside the lands of Islam — on the condition that they do not accept indefinitely the law and legislation of that country and being indefinite belonging to the nation of the non-Muslim country so that they become loyal to all their allies and an enemy to all their enemies — and obtaining the citizenship is considered a required means in order to organize the affairs of Muslims who already live there while ensuring fulfilling vows and agreements between them and host countries, and exists due to urgent necessities and needs and this Muslim kept his loyalty to Allaah and His Messenger, then it would not be farfetched to say that it would be permissible.

***

My colleague Translating Jihad [6] has just rendered into English [7] an Arabic-language paper published by the Assembly of Muslim Jurists of America (AMJA [8]) in 2007, and presented at their 2008 careers conference in Houston [9]. As he observes, aptly, in his introduction to the posting, "Credit goes to the Center for Security Policy [10] for discovering this paper and bringing it to me for translation."

The mission statement of the Assembly of Muslim Jurists of America (AMJA) maintains the organization was, "…founded to provide guidance for Muslims living in North America…AMJA is a religious organization that does not exploit religion to achieve any political ends, but instead provides practical solutions within the guidelines of Islam and the nation's laws to the various challenges experienced by Muslim communities…" With regard to the Sharia, specifically, AMJA's stated purpose [11] is to "clarify the rulings of the sharia which are relevant for those who live in America." AMJA is well-accepted [12] by the mainstream American Muslim community. The Islamic scholars affiliated with this group maintain influential positions in universities, Islamic centers, and mosques throughout the United States. Translating Jihad compiled a list of some of their prominent members, including the names of universities and other organizations with which they're affiliated, accessed from AMJA's website [13]:


  • Mohammad Naeem AlSaei, University of Texas, American Open University (AOU) (Virginia);
  • Waleed Basyouni, North American Imam Federation (NAIF) (Arizona), Texas Dawah Convention, AlMaghrib Institute (Texas);
  • Hatem AlHaj, Sharia Academy of America (Florida), Albert Lea Medical Center (Minnesota), NAIF, Islamic Jurisprudence Council of Minnesota;
  • Waleed Al-Maneese, Dar-al-Farooq Islamic Center (Minnesota), University of Minnesota, AOU, NAIF;
  • Muwaffak Al Ghaylany, Islamic Center in Grand Blank City (Minnesota), Shari`a Academy in America (Florida), NAIF:
  • Main Al-Qudah, MAS Katy Center (Texas), AOU, Islamic American University (Minnesota), Al-Yarmook University (Iraq);
  • Salah Alsawy, Institute of Arabic and Islamic Sciences (Virginia), AOU, Sharia Academy (Florida), Al-Azhar University (Egypt), Umm Al Qura University (Saudi Arabia); and
  • Muhammad Adam Alsheikh, Al Rahmah Mosque (Maryland), Sudanese courts.
  • Alsheikh, Al Rahmah Mosque (Maryland), Sudanese courts.
Notwithstanding this mainstream acceptance, including uncritical endorsement [12] of its seventh annual American conference in Houston (October 15-18, 2010) to train American imams, AMJA has issued rulings which sanction the killing of apostates (here [14]), "blasphemers" (including non-Muslims guilty of this "crime"; here [15]), or adulterers (by stoning to death, here [16]), and condone [17] marital rape. Even more ominously, another Arabic-language fatwa from AMJA's Dr. Salah Al-Sawy leaves open the possibility for offensive jihad against America and the West, as soon as Muslims are strong enough to do so. When asked whether "the Islamic missionary effort in the West … [was] to the point where it could take advantage of offensive jihad," Al-Sawy ruled [18]:

The Islamic community does not possess the strength to engage in offensive jihad at this time. With our current capabilities, we are aspiring toward defensive jihad, and to improve our position with regards to jurisprudence at this stage. But there is a different discussion for each situation. Allah Almighty knows best.

It is also of grave concern that AMJA, as an American organization, offers only grudging and conditional support to the fundamental notions of acquiring citizenship in, and swearing allegiance to, the U.S. and our Sharia-antithetical governing legal system. Responding to the query: "Is acquiring an American citizenship lawful or prohibited?" AMJA issued fatwa #77223 [19]:

As for optionally obtaining citizenship of a non-Muslim country it is definitely prohibited without a doubt, moreover it could be a form of apostasy or main means leading to apostasy because willingly accepting the laws of disbelievers and obeying it without any valid excuse or enforcement, or ignorance is considered a nullifier to Tawheed and Islam, as long as the proof has been established upon this person and the matter and its consequences are as I clarified. As for obtaining citizenships in light of circumstances of Muslims today who are residing outside the lands of Islam — on the condition that they do not accept indefinitely the law and legislation of that country and being indefinite belonging to the nation of the non-Muslim country so that they become loyal to all their allies and an enemy to all their enemies — and obtaining the citizenship is considered a required means in order to organize the affairs of Muslims who already live there while ensuring fulfilling vows and agreements between them and host countries, and exists due to urgent necessities and needs and this Muslim kept his loyalty to Allaah and His Messenger, then it would not be farfetched to say that it would be permissible.

Now [7], Translating Jihad puts what one might wish to deem as these circumscribed, "purely Islamic" rulings, in a more disturbing—and entirely unacceptable, seditious context. AMJA's own words make plain the organization's long term commitment to superseding the US legal code with its antithesis, a Sharia-based system.

As Translating Jihad notes in his introductory summary [7] of the newly translated 2007 AMJA paper, it

…provides guidelines for American Muslims on what they can and cannot do vis-à-vis infidel legal systems. The paper makes clear that according to Islam, the only legitimate law is that which comes from Allah, and in fact authority to make laws rests with Allah alone. This renders every other legal system—including the American system—illegitimate.


[Continue reading article here]


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Make sure you receive all of your messages from ACT for America. Add actforamerica@donationnet.net to your address book as an approved email sender. If you found this message in your "Bulk" or "Spam" folder, please click the "Not Spam" button to notify your provider that these are emails you want to receive.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ACT for America
P.O. Box 12765
Pensacola, FL 32591
www.actforamerica.org


ACT for America is an issues advocacy organization dedicated to effectively organizing and mobilizing the most powerful grassroots citizen action network in America, a grassroots network committed to informed and coordinated civic action that will lead to public policies that promote America's national security and the defense of American democratic values against the assault of radical Islam. We are only as strong as our supporters, and your volunteer and financial support is essential to our success. Thank you for helping us make America safer and more secure.

The news items, blogs, educational materials and other information in our emails and on our website are only intended to provide information, news and commentary on events and issues related to the threat of radical Islam. Much of this information is based upon media sources, such as the AP wire services, newspapers, magazines, books, online news blog and news services, and radio and television, which we deem to be reliable. However, we have undertaken no independent investigation to verify the accuracy of the information reported by these media sources. We therefore disclaim all liability for false or inaccurate information from these media sources. We also disclaim all liability for the third-party information that may be accessed through the material referenced in our emails or posted on our website.


HOW CAN I TELL OTHERS ABOUT YOUR ORGANIZATION?
Send a personalized version of this message to your friends.

HOW CAN I SUPPORT YOUR ORGANIZATION?
Click here to give an online donation.

Wednesday, March 14, 2012

(Planning trip) From ACT! for America: Come Meet Brigitte!

I am working to attend the Lincoln, Nebraska event April 25.  If anyone would be interested in going with, please reply ASAP.  Thank you.

Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 2:18 PM
Subject: Come Meet Brigitte!
homelearnactdonatelocal chaptersContact Congress
ACT! for America

Brigitte Gabriel to Speak in Waukee, Iowa,
and Lincoln, Nebraska!


Brigitte Gabriel
Leading expert on Global Islamic Terrorism


Dear Lee,

It's my privilege to invite you to one of two special events featuring Brigitte Gabriel, ACT! for America President. The events will be held as follows and are free and open to the public.


Here are the details:

1st Event

Date:         Tuesday, April 24, 2012
Time:         7:00 PM to 9:00 PM
Location:  Point of Grace Ministries
                    305 NE Dartmoor Drive
                    Waukee, Iowa 50263


2nd Event

Date:         Wednesday, April 25, 2012
Time:         7:00 PM to 9:00 PM
Location:  Calvary Community Church
                    4400 N. 1st
                    Lincoln, Nebraska 68521


The events of the past eighteen months have been a sobering wake-up call to America. Without question, the threats radical Islam poses to America have increased.

Brigitte will discuss these threats to our security and our freedoms, such as…

  • The growing threat of homegrown jihad, with the number of such jihadist plots skyrocketing over the past two years.

  • How terrorists are exploiting our porous southern border, often working with drug cartels.

  • The increasingly militant—and successful—effort by Islamists worldwide to suppress free speech and criminalize any criticism of Islam.

  • The growing Muslim Brotherhood threat and how Islamic sharia law is creeping into America.

  • How the history and doctrines of Islam are being misrepresented in public school textbooks and classrooms.
For a taste of the treat we have in store for you, check out one of Brigitte's recent speeches at an event in Nashville, Tennessee:

http://www.tennessean.com/VideoNetwork/1271237687001/ACT-for-America-founder-speaks-at-anti-Shariah-conference-in-Nashville

But even more important than this, Brigitte will spell out the strategies and tactics ACT! for America is employing to effectively fight back against these threats.

Brigitte's message will be illuminating, at times disturbing and even shocking—but ultimately inspiring, empowering, and filled with hope!

You will hear first-hand how ACT! for America is successfully rolling back the tide of radical Islam…how we are winning legislative victories…how we don't have to live in fear or resign ourselves to the inevitability of the threats arrayed against us...and how we will prevail.

I also encourage you to email this to people you know who might be interested in attending. A few years ago we did an event like this in Indiana and one of our members in Oregon found out about it and emailed a friend in Indiana—who then brought 21 people to the event!!

We're sending this email to all our members in Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas, Missouri, Illinois, Wisconsin, Minnesota and South Dakota because we know, from prior experience, that many people are willing to travel to hear Brigitte speak and they forward announcements like these to people they know who live in the area.

I know those of you who have heard Brigitte will agree—you don't want to miss this! It will be an event people will be talking about for a long time to come!

Invite your friends and come join us in either Waukee, Iowa, or Lincoln, Nebraska. We look forward to seeing you on April 24th or 25th!

Yours for a safe and free America,


Guy Rodgers
Executive Director


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Make sure you receive all of your messages from ACT for America. Add actforamerica@donationnet.net to your address book as an approved email sender. If you found this message in your "Bulk" or "Spam" folder, please click the "Not Spam" button to notify your provider that these are emails you want to receive.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ACT for America
P.O. Box 12765
Pensacola, FL 32591
www.actforamerica.org


ACT for America is an issues advocacy organization dedicated to effectively organizing and mobilizing the most powerful grassroots citizen action network in America, a grassroots network committed to informed and coordinated civic action that will lead to public policies that promote America's national security and the defense of American democratic values against the assault of radical Islam. We are only as strong as our supporters, and your volunteer and financial support is essential to our success. Thank you for helping us make America safer and more secure.

The news items, blogs, educational materials and other information in our emails and on our website are only intended to provide information, news and commentary on events and issues related to the threat of radical Islam. Much of this information is based upon media sources, such as the AP wire services, newspapers, magazines, books, online news blog and news services, and radio and television, which we deem to be reliable. However, we have undertaken no independent investigation to verify the accuracy of the information reported by these media sources. We therefore disclaim all liability for false or inaccurate information from these media sources. We also disclaim all liability for the third-party information that may be accessed through the material referenced in our emails or posted on our website.



HOW CAN I TELL OTHERS ABOUT YOUR ORGANIZATION?
Send a personalized version of this message to your friends.

HOW CAN I SUPPORT YOUR ORGANIZATION?
Click here to give an online donation.

Why I'm a Reactionary, not a conservative

As a Reactionary, I am staunchly on the traditionalist, Rightwing end of the political spectrum, but not bound by the selfishness, materialism, or short-sighted ignorance of "conservatives."
Note the following tripe from 2005 by Walter E. Williams, a favorite token Negro conservative on matters economic, and note the reality which I point out in my brilliant comment on the excerpted portion:
The role of prices
Suppose a hotel room rented for $79 a night prior to Hurricane Katrina's devastation. Based on that price, an evacuating family of four might rent two adjoining rooms. When they arrive at the hotel, they find the rooms rent for $200; they decide to make do with one room. In my book, that's wonderful. The family voluntarily opted to make a room available for another family who had to evacuate or whose home was destroyed. Demagogues will call this price-gouging, but I ask you, which is preferable: a room available at $200 or a room unavailable at $79? Rising prices get people to voluntarily economize on goods and services rendered scarcer by the disaster.
COMMENT: Mr. Williams has argued elsewhere that this is a sufficient form of "rationing" to meet needs in an emergency situation. He is wrong. Whereas Mr. Williams chooses to contrive a situation to demonstrate his conservative view, allow me to use his own situation to present a scenario demonstrating how wrong he is:
Suppose a hotel room rented for $79 a night prior to Hurricane Katrina's devastation. Based on that price, an evacuating family of four with low income and very little cash on hand--or credit, presuming the communications grid is even still working--might opt to expend their limited fuel to travel to this establishment in order to provide shelter for themselves, including their young, sick baby in desperate need of air conditioning, in a single room. When they arrive at the hotel, they find the rooms rent for $200; they are screwed, as they cannot afford a room there, have no viable means to find different accomodations, and are faced spending a night in their vehicle with a sick child, heat and humidity in the air, and less-than-savory types running around looting and raping and generally oppressing those without the relative safety of accomodations at the hotel.
In my book, that's horrible. The family acted in the most rational manner, desired nothing more than basic safety, and failed because though there was "room at the inn," the innkeeper was more devoted to milking profit than offering reasonable (remember, he can still get $79 per room) help to his fellow Americans. Conservatives, Tea Partiers, and rich Negroes will call this "voluntary economization," but I ask you, which is more conducive to our countrymen and our society surviving: a room open but unavailable at $200 or a room open and available at $79? Rising prices "economize" only in favor of more well-to-do people, in a situation that ought not be governed by economics so much as responsibility and duty.
Here is how I as Fuehr..., ur, Leader, of the country, state or whatever would handle the precise situation regarding hotel rooms: All hotel or similar accommodations would be put under an immediate price freeze. This means that nicer, more expensive places would remain nicer and more expensive, and anyone with the means to acquire them would be welcome to do so. The object here is neither equality of outcome nor "fairness"--nor, for that matter, "liberty"--but rather survival. Facilities would be rationed, meaning that a couple with two children would not be allowed to rent more than a single room--they can do without gettin' some that night. Ideally, at least four people would be in each room, which would involve requiring families traveling together to room together--again, they can do without that night. Travel groups attempting to perpetuate a fraud that they are not "together" would be subject to prosecution. Innkeepers would be, uh, "encouraged" to lower prices, at least on rooms not rented before midnight, a step which would 1. open shelter to more people; 2. retain some recognition of social-class differences (the poor family may need some help, but they are still poor and need to understand that); and 3. keep the actions in the emergency situation as much within the general parameters of free/private enterprise as possible.
(Oh, I would also encourage something akin to "shoot-on-sight" ROE for looters, etc., telling local law enforcement, prosecutors, etc., to "take in perspective" what happened that night back behind the hotel. After all, [REDACTED TO AVOID, UH, "MISUNDERSTANDING"--BUT IT'S A DARN GOOD IDEA!])
Free enterprise economics works wonderfully... within the sphere of economics. When a situation is far more identifiable with a non-economic sphere--such as issues of security, physical survival, or reasonable treatment of our furry friends (and I don't mean hippies)--free enterprise economics must give way to other means and principles. Emergency situations, particularly in cases of urgency (when time is of the essence), sometimes call for the suspension of market forces in some areas, though not necessarily in others. Consider these examples and counter-examples in the context of an emergency situation:
  • Rationing candy by market forces is fine; thusly rationing nutritious foodstuffs is not.
  • Rationing fancy gun accessories by market forces is fine; thusly rationing militarily-suitable weapons is not.
  • Rationing spots at the gun range by market forces is fine; thusly rationing ammunition is not.
  • Rationing comfortable seats on a bus by market forces is fine; thusly rationing all mass transportation is not.
  • Rationing prophylactics by market forces is fine; thusly rationing actual needed medication is not.
  • Rationing booze by market forces is fine; thusly rationing potable water is not.
  • Rationing control over what channel is on a giant screen TV in a shelter by market forces is fine; thusly rationing space in that shelter is not.
  • Rationing "nice" clothes by market forces is fine; thusly rationing basic clothing and blankets (especially in a cold situation) is not.
  • Rationing doggy and kitty treats by market forces is fine; thusly rationing basic pet food is not. (Gotta remember our furry friends in this!)
And the list could go on.
Some will call this "socialism". I actually have no objection to that, provided they add the term, "national" in front of it. (HEE HEE!) As a Reactionary, I am not bound by conservative sensitivities. That said, note that my plan not only does not abolish free enterprise on the everyday scene, but in fact goes above and beyond to maintain much of it as possible while accomplishing the necessary objective--namely, housing and protecting the population in a natural disaster.
And that goes to the difference between the far Left and the far Right--they may often, as per JFK, look alike, but they on a macro scale, have vastly different agendas. Ron Paul and the far Left look alike on matters of foreign policy and defense inasfar as how both wish to cause the decline of America, but they have vastly different agendas--Leftists want to destroy traditional American/Western civilization; Ron Paul wants to destroy ZOG. One side is ideological; the other side is delusional.
Likewise, and for a more positive example, I myself and many on the Left want to improve the conditions of our furry friends, but we have vastly different agendas--Leftists want to destroy traditional and natural distinctions in the interest of an uber-socialist aim toward the "stateless utopia"; I want to act with righteousness and sensitivity toward other examples of God's creatures with nervous systems and some thinking ability, as well as stay in accord with my, "Don't screw over your allies" principle, including by setting for special protection for those animal types particularly "allied" with humanity--canines, felines, marine mammals (check out "Pelorus Jack," and think about how some dumbfuck tried to shoot him), certain birds, equines, primates (generally), and possibly hamsters and guinea pigs (but not gerbils--I'm told they stink). One side is counter to nature; the other side is in accord with reality, morality, nature, and the divine order, as well as human societal well-being ("Pelorus Jack" facilitated commerce).
I hope this has provided you, my loyal readers, some insight into how to balance legitimate private material concerns with the higher values of upholding our great nation and civilization. Also, I hope it has set out a guidepost to aid ideologues on the Right to recognize when one of their own is being short-sighted and ignorant.
Thank you for reading, and y'all have a real nice day!

Why civil libertarianism fails -- Fw: [New post] CAIR and the American Future



Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 12:06 AM
Subject: [New post] CAIR and the American Future

New post on ACT! for America Houston

CAIR and the American Future

by witnesstojihad
"Yet so devoted are some civil libertarians to their metaphorical dream of "protective rights" that they are willing to allow despoilers of our system to exploit the laws of the land for their own defense. What appears to be lacking or insufficiently defined is moral clarity. If someone wants to kill you or destroy your [...]
witnesstojihad | March 13, 2012 at 11:06 pm | Categories: CAIR, Creeping Sharia, FBI, Global Islamic caliphate, Islam, Jihad, Sharia Law | URL: http://wp.me/p1ggVf-1NI
 
Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://actforamericahouston.wordpress.com/2012/03/13/cair-and-the-american-future-2/

Tuesday, March 13, 2012

The great James David Manning on a role! -- Fwd: "Black Folk Don't Know How to Run No Nation"

The great James David Manning on a role!

----- Forwarded Message -----

Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 4:00 PM
Subject: Fwd: "Black Folk Don't Know How to Run No Nation"





Notice the phrase is in quotes…I didn't say it.  A Black man said it!
 It takes no guts to listen to the media constantly attack with their biased double-standard trash a white republican presidents, or white conservative radio talk show hosts, or a white republican women…the media is awash with that kind of over the top propaganda....they love making great sport of it, like gladiators in a coliseum in the days of old, doing the bidding of the King in destroying those the King had marked for public humiliation and death…they love doing such favors for the King, protecting him, and currying his favor… Rewarding each other with trophies and prestigious awards for the meanest, cruelest, cleverest, and most ruthless of their peers who've made it their life's work destroying publicly those the King has condemned.
 
What does take guts, is to listen to an opposing opinion of the King; to listen to both sides; make a judgment based on reasoned logical and empirical evidence; coming to a conclusion and a course of action based on truth, not on emotion, covetousness, greed, and a lust for mob vengeance in the hopes of sharing in the King's bounty and booty.
 
 
 


From ACT! for America: We are shocked...shocked!!


Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 12:49 PM
Subject: We are shocked...shocked!!
homelearnactdonatelocal chaptersContact Congress
ACT! for America
Visit our News page



March 13, 2012

We are shocked…shocked!

Dear Lee,

In that famous scene in the movie "Casablanca," Captain Renault exclaims to Rick that he is "shocked, shocked" to find gambling going on.

Just so, we are "shocked" to read that a former CAIR official, now a candidate for President in Egypt, wants to fully implement sharia law. (See the Jihad Watch post below, highlights added, and the link to the MEMRI video.)

As we have said before, it's clear to us that CAIR's real agenda is not protecting "civil rights"—but insinuating sharia law into America in any way possible.


What do you think? Join us on our Facebook page and give us your thoughts!



Former Hamas-linked CAIR official running for president in Egypt, pledges to "complete the implementation of Islamic law in Egypt"

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2012/03/former-hamas-linked-cair-official-running-for-president-in-egypt-pledges-to-complete-the-implementat.html

What he says is not so surprising. Who he is is what is noteworthy here. "Egyptian Presidential Candidate Bassem Khafaji Pledges to 'Complete the Implementation of Islamic Law in Egypt,'" from MEMRI TV, March 7 (thanks to Benedict):

Following are excerpts from Egyptian presidential candidate Bassem Khafaji, which aired on Al-Nas TV on March 7, 2012:

Bassem Khafaji: Let me tell you, in all honesty, that as a Muslim Egyptian, I am convinced of [the need to] complete the implementation of Islamic law in Egypt. I do not hide this truth in any way, because it is in keeping with the inclination of the Egyptian people.

We Egyptians – both Muslims and non-Muslims – refer to the shari'a in many things. I often ask people: How did you get married? Wasn't it according to the shari'a, regardless of whether you are Muslim or not? Weren't you married in accordance with your religion? When somebody in our family dies, how we inherit him? Not in accordance with the shari'a?

No [candidate] should say that he is coming to implement the shari'a, because part of it has already been implemented. What the Egyptian people want is to complete this implementation. As president, I will personally assist in the completion of the correct implementation of the shari'a, by consulting the experts [in Islamic law].

Jihad Watch reader Benedict, who kindly alerted me to the above item, also points out that Bassem Khafaji, or Khafagi, used to work in the U.S. for Hamas-linked CAIR:

The former community affairs director for the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), Bassem Khafagi was arrested in January 2003 on suspicion of aiding terrorists. Khafagi is also the founder of the Islamic Assembly of North America (IANA), a radical, Ann Arbor, Michigan-based organization. He pled guilty in a Detroit federal court to two counts of bank fraud and one count of visa fraud.

Hamas-linked CAIR constantly insists that Muslims in the U.S. don't want to implement Sharia here. So did Khafagi change his mind about Sharia when he went back to Egypt? Or does he think Sharia should be implemented in Egypt but not here? Or maybe he and others in Hamas-linked CAIR really do want to bring Sharia here? I confidently await the imminent explanation from Honest Ibe Hooper, clearing all this up!


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Make sure you receive all of your messages from ACT for America. Add actforamerica@donationnet.net to your address book as an approved email sender. If you found this message in your "Bulk" or "Spam" folder, please click the "Not Spam" button to notify your provider that these are emails you want to receive.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ACT for America
P.O. Box 12765
Pensacola, FL 32591
www.actforamerica.org


ACT for America is an issues advocacy organization dedicated to effectively organizing and mobilizing the most powerful grassroots citizen action network in America, a grassroots network committed to informed and coordinated civic action that will lead to public policies that promote America's national security and the defense of American democratic values against the assault of radical Islam. We are only as strong as our supporters, and your volunteer and financial support is essential to our success. Thank you for helping us make America safer and more secure.

The news items, blogs, educational materials and other information in our emails and on our website are only intended to provide information, news and commentary on events and issues related to the threat of radical Islam. Much of this information is based upon media sources, such as the AP wire services, newspapers, magazines, books, online news blog and news services, and radio and television, which we deem to be reliable. However, we have undertaken no independent investigation to verify the accuracy of the information reported by these media sources. We therefore disclaim all liability for false or inaccurate information from these media sources. We also disclaim all liability for the third-party information that may be accessed through the material referenced in our emails or posted on our website.


HOW CAN I TELL OTHERS ABOUT YOUR ORGANIZATION?
Send a personalized version of this message to your friends.

HOW CAN I SUPPORT YOUR ORGANIZATION?
Click here to give an online donation.